Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

An Evening With... Jeremy Corbyn

Options
18384868889137

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mumps wrote: »
    The only comprehensive in my town is a sports specialist school. If you don't pass the 11 plus or get a place in a school in another town you go to the sports college. I honestly don't know why it is classed as a specialist school, the kids who go there don't have to have any particular ability in sport and they don't seem to do any more sport than anywhere else. The only difference I can see is they got some special funding, from Sport England I think, for a big new sports hall.

    I wonder if maths schools get grants from Maths England for ........... I'm not sure what they'd get, protractors?

    indeed, 'specialist' school are simply a con and contribute zero to the education of the vast majority of our children
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,240 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    extra maths lessons if a maths special school (what do they do without)
    more foreign language lessons in a language school (what do they do without?)

    Perhaps singing and drama?
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Corbyn does not represent all of the Labour Party let alone all Labour voters.

    I know? I was referring to Corbynistas, not Labour voters, that's why I called them Corbynistas, not Labour voters.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Fella wrote: »
    I know? I was referring to Corbynistas, not Labour voters, that's why I called them Corbynistas, not Labour voters.
    Fair enough but some posters seem unable to see the difference.
  • I love the way Labour people now insist that Tony Blair's wasn't a Labour government and how Labour party members are not all Labour party supporters. What an utter shower of loons!
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Fair enough but some posters seem unable to see the difference.

    As far as I'm concerned Corbyn's Momentum lot are to regular Labour voters what the BNP are/were to the Tories. And every bit as unpleasant.

    The difference is Miliband was foolish enough to instigate a system that allowed them to organize themselves & take control. Extremely bad news for all parties IMO.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Fella wrote: »
    As far as I'm concerned Corbyn's Momentum lot are to regular Labour voters what the BNP are/were to the Tories. And every bit as unpleasant.

    The difference is Miliband was foolish enough to instigate a system that allowed them to organize themselves & take control. Extremely bad news for all parties IMO.
    Not just Miliband I wonder how MPs who nominated and voted for Corbyn feel now.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    Fella wrote: »
    As far as I'm concerned Corbyn's Momentum lot are to regular Labour voters what the BNP are/were to the Tories. And every bit as unpleasant.

    The difference is Miliband was foolish enough to instigate a system that allowed them to organize themselves & take control. Extremely bad news for all parties IMO.

    The fact that labour did such a thing demonstrates exactly why blindly following some ideological line without thinking through the longer term consequences usually ends up in a total mess.
    Tax credits anyone?
  • Fella wrote: »
    As far as I'm concerned Corbyn's Momentum lot are to regular Labour voters what the BNP are/were to the Tories. And every bit as unpleasant.

    The difference is Miliband was foolish enough to instigate a system that allowed them to organize themselves & take control. Extremely bad news for all parties IMO.

    Can you explain which of Corbyn's policies you actually don't like?

    Thus far you are all ranting that you hate his policies and don't know what they are.

    Which doesn't make a lot of sense if you want to rally against the Red Peril you seem to think is coming.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    Can you explain which of Corbyn's policies you actually don't like?

    Thus far you are all ranting that you hate his policies and don't know what they are.

    Which doesn't make a lot of sense if you want to rally against the Red Peril you seem to think is coming.

    The post you quoted didn't make any reference to corbyn's policies.

    But apparently you want to mention that no-one knows what these policies are as being some kind of defence of the man. How bizarre!

    The secret to winning an election - don't tell the people who vote what your policies are. Nice one.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.