car windscreen chip, who is liable

odemwingie5

so if someone is trying to claim for a chip that in all probability was already there and they know this in my opinion, why would i entertain anything they say being the truth?

odemwingie5

Silver-Surfer wrote: »

You're in denial aren't you and you're looking to excuse your bad parenting.

lol you really are out to paint me as a bad parent lol, weird when you don't know me, i've explained the incident yet you're more than happy to disbelieve me and harp on about my apparent bad parenting because i didn't strap my child to me and i can't promise that i had my eyes on him for every second that day, each to there own, seems as if you wanna push this and get into an internet argument about it,

odemwingie5

Now you need to insult my grammar, i think that's how we evolve this further.

AdrianC

odemwingie5 wrote: »

lol you really are out to paint me as a bad parent lol, weird when you don't know me

Indeed. We only know the circumstances as you've described them, with the best possible gloss that you can put on them.

odemwingie5

AdrianC wrote: »

Indeed. We only know the circumstances as you've described them, with the best possible gloss that you can put on them.

simple question, if you had doubt would you pay up?

AdrianC

odemwingie5 wrote: »

simple question, if you had doubt would you pay up?

I wouldn't be in the position you're in, so whether I doubted my neighbours would not be an issue.

odemwingie5

AdrianC wrote: »

I wouldn't be in the position you're in, so whether I doubted my neighbours would not be an issue.

why's that?

dannyrst

Incredible. Let me ask the majority of people on this thread a question, do you watch your child every minute of the day? I didn't think so, so wind your necks in a little and be realistic.

You all seem to be suggesting the OP should have told his son not to throw stones at cars. How on earth do you think to tell a child that without it happening first? They need to do wrong to learn from their mistakes and learn right from wrong.

If there is damage on the car, the OP has no responsibility to pay for it. Morally, that's another question and that comes down to whether the OP believes his child caused the damage or the two people are chancing it because they saw it happen and think it's an easy way to make some money (which is potentially the case if they have submitted this to a court already, fear tactics).

I think some of you need to chill out a little. I bet your children have done things they shouldn't have without you seeing.

AdrianC

dannyrst wrote: »

Incredible. Let me ask the majority of people on this thread a question, do you watch your child every minute of the day?

We're talking about a 4yo, next to a road.

dannyrst

AdrianC wrote: »

We're talking about a 4yo, next to a road.

Do you know where this guy lives? Fence up? Gate locked?