We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Drink driving

Options
S.42 of The Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988

Has any one been to court to have there driving liecence back early.

Post past experience
«134567

Comments

  • EssexExile
    EssexExile Posts: 6,454 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I've been in court when this has happened, it was a while ago so I can't recall the exact details. I think it was something like a 3 year ban which was over half spent & she had a job lined up that required her to drive. She got what she wanted. I suspect that the bench are so used to people coming up before them again & again for similar matters that if someone appears who made one bad mistake several years ago & has been good since (or not caught!) they get looked on kindly.
    Tall, dark & handsome. Well two out of three ain't bad.
  • pd52
    pd52 Posts: 514 Forumite
    Hope that it doesn't get given back early !
  • bigjl
    bigjl Posts: 6,457 Forumite
    If you got more than a 1 yr Ban then the circumstances of the DD offence are likely to be worse than the average offence.

    Personally Inhope they increase the ban.
  • Daniel_wb
    Daniel_wb Posts: 15 Forumite
    Courts can't increase the ban as double jeopardy implied
  • Daniel_wb wrote: »
    Courts can't increase the ban as double jeopardy implied

    If you're such an expert then, why are you here asking about process.

    Hope the ban's a long one, drink drivers are !!!!!!!!s.
  • Daniel_wb
    Daniel_wb Posts: 15 Forumite
    Thee driver has already admitted to the offence pleaded guilty As double jeopardy
    Can't be implied
  • Daniel_wb wrote: »
    Thee driver has already admitted to the offence pleaded guilty As double jeopardy
    Can't be implied

    You're struggling with your words there I see. Maybe a drink would help?
  • Exemplar
    Exemplar Posts: 1,610 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You're struggling with your words there I see. Maybe a drink would help?

    Thank you thank you I'm here all night!
    'Just because its on the internet don't believe it 100%'. Abraham Lincoln.

    I have opinions, you have opinions. All of our opinions are valid whether they are based on fact or feeling. Respect other peoples opinions, stop forcing your opinions on other people and the world will be a happier place.
  • londonTiger
    londonTiger Posts: 4,903 Forumite
    dd should be ban for life. You cannot be trusted to do something as basic as drive sober.
  • Daniel_wb wrote: »
    Courts can't increase the ban as double jeopardy implied


    You really should read up on what you are going to post about before actually posting.


    Double jeopardy refers to being tried for the same offence twice and has nothing to do with an appeals court increasing the original sentence.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/drivers-sentence-for-deaths-is-doubled-1594346.html
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.