We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.

147485052531544

Comments

  • HornetSaver
    HornetSaver Posts: 3,732 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    One thing I've never understood about the Holyrood election system (and indeed the Welsh Assembly one too). Why should parties get to cherry pick their list candidates?

    Why not just have FPTP for the constituency seats, transfer excess votes over to determine the region seat allocation per party, and give those seats to the candidates that came closest to winning their races? So let's say Labour win one regional seat - that regional seat should go to the candidate who came closest to getting a mandate in the constituency, not the most senior hanger-on.

    It would also reduce tactical voting in the constituency races - if you want to vote Labour but think the Lib Dems or Tories have a better chance of beating the SNP (as is the case in most places nowadays - the Tories are the only unionist party with a competent leader, and the only one not trying to be like the SNP. The Lib Dems are the only party with pockets of places where personal votes count for anything), you would be penalised for that tactical vote by getting someone who doesn't represent you as well a better shot at the regional list, rather than a "free shot" at the SNP in the constituency and then voting for Labour on your completely separate regional vote.

    Wales is arguably a clearer example. A lot of Welsh voters want to be represented by UKIP, and it is of course right that they are getting a few AMs. Whether those UKIP voters want that representation to be provided by Hamilton and Reckless is a different question entirely.

    Back to Scotland though, and it could be argued that the SNP would have won a majority under the tweak I suggest (similar list performance but a couple more constituencies due to reduced tactical voting). Though ironically the lack of an SNP majority makes Sturgeon's position better - if things go wrong it's a bit easier for her to say "we didn't have a majority and had to compromise", and indeed as she's more cautious/pragmatic than most of her voters on the optimum moment to go for Indyref2, she can use the lack of a majority as an excuse not call a referendum she's not overwhemingly confident of winning.

    What SNP supporters tend to gloss over is that there's a limit to how many referendums you can lose without doing your own cause damage. They're damn lucky to have Sturgeon, because she will not call one unless it's inconceivable that the unionists would win. Until that time, she will let the issue continue to be a burning point of debate as it's in her political interest, and in turn by being in power she has the ability to call that referendum when the timing is right.
  • elantan
    elantan Posts: 21,022 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Leanne1812 wrote: »
    Some of us have been at work and napping after a late night/unsettled sleep watching the results. :)

    You can spin it however much you like Hamish but the fact remains there are more pro Indy MSP's at Holyrood than anti.

    I'm quite enjoying your excited gleeful posts but do try and remember this important fact.

    I'm a little disappointed in my constituency. We remain labour after a recount revealed 109 votes between the incumbent and the SNP challenger. Faslane had something to do with her victory I'm sure.



    God you got her ? My sympathies, she is such an utter useless human being

    Also the snp increased their number of votes over 2011 ... now that's impressive for a third term ... and those 6 greens... it's an Indy parly again :)
  • Rinoa
    Rinoa Posts: 2,701 Forumite
    Odds for Scotland to be independent by 2020 slide from 4/1 to 10/1.

    Sums it up nicely.

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/holyrood-2016-odds-of-indyref-2-decrease-1-4120812
    If I don't reply to your post,
    you're probably on my ignore list.
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Leanne1812 wrote: »

    You can spin it however much you like Hamish but the fact remains there are more pro Indy MSP's at Holyrood than anti.

    I'm quite enjoying your excited gleeful posts but do try and remember this important fact.

    As long as you remember that oh so 'progressive' Scotland has just embraced those nasty Tories again. 😀
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • Leanne1812
    Leanne1812 Posts: 1,688 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    elantan wrote: »
    God you got her ? My sympathies, she is such an utter useless human being

    Also the snp increased their number of votes over 2011 ... now that's impressive for a third term ... and those 6 greens... it's an Indy parly again :)

    Yes, sadly Jackie was re-elected here. I think everyone who didn't vote for her is pretty bewildered. She was getting in anyway as 1st on the list but she was obviously rightly concerned she'd lose the constituency. I'm sure the SNP candidate will be crushed at losing with so narrow a margin. :(

    Yes, I saw a graph earlier on Twitter with a few facts that may displease Hamish. I tried to post but it failed. I'll try again. :)
  • Leanne1812
    Leanne1812 Posts: 1,688 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Tromking wrote: »
    As long as you remember that oh so 'progressive' Scotland has just embraced those nasty Tories again. 😀

    Purely tactical Tromking. We all know this.
  • Leanne1812
    Leanne1812 Posts: 1,688 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Rinoa wrote: »
    Odds for Scotland to be independent by 2020 slide from 4/1 to 10/1.

    Sums it up nicely.

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/holyrood-2016-odds-of-indyref-2-decrease-1-4120812

    It's a long game. We're patient us scots :)
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Leanne1812 wrote: »
    Purely tactical Tromking. We all know this.

    You're on the ground Leanne and I'm not, but that sounds complacent. Looking at the Scottish electoral map the 'English'border sees to have moved northwards overnight.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • Leanne1812
    Leanne1812 Posts: 1,688 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Tromking wrote: »
    You're on the ground Leanne and I'm not, but that sounds complacent. Looking at the Scottish electoral map the 'English'border sees to have moved northwards overnight.


    It's quite simple. We're 2 camps here politically. Pro Indy and anti. The tories have rebranded as the Conservative & Unionist Party. Look at the state of labour up here, many feel they weren't worth their vote. You hate the SNP and you want to remain part of the U.K. Who would you vote for?
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Leanne1812 wrote: »
    It's quite simple. We're 2 camps here politically. Pro Indy and anti. The tories have rebranded as the Conservative & Unionist Party. Look at the state of labour up here, many feel they weren't worth their vote. You hate the SNP and you want to remain part of the U.K. Who would you vote for?

    I do get that, not least because I've been telling Shakey that Scotland is the new Ulster for months. A vote for the Tories is no more a tactical vote than one for the SNP.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.