Help needed arguing Esure's valuation

AdrianC

maddogb wrote: »

no the car did not crash, it was "safe" to traverse the water, I had to wait for another car to pass safely in the deeper water on the other side of the road.

So, umm, why is there an insurance claim in the first place?

AdrianC

maddogb wrote: »

no, no they don't, even with your added "condition" I can find many definitions that are not contained in any car insurance procedural document so again you are wrong, getting to be a habit there dude.

Umm, so they aren't relevant to car insurance, are they?

cmon, there are at least 5, write in your homework book, must try harder, posting nonsense like this is helping me soooo much.

Oh, good. Have eSure phoned you and increased their offer, because of this thread?

maddogb

motorguy wrote: »

It doesnt matter what YOUR definition of market value is OR what whats on the internet relating to market value, its whats been defined as market value by the insurance companies in their policy document - the one you would have had access to but didnt bother reading - thats the important one.

oh but I did read it and guess what they are using a different definition to calculate the payout..lol I almost think you might blunder in to it here, I wait with baited breath..