We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

If we vote for Brexit what happens

1131813191321132313242072

Comments

  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,995 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    setmefree2 wrote: »
    I know it's been mentioned but I'm going to highlight it 'cos I think its bloody great news

    :T:T:T:T:T


    It is great news. However, since it's our government, my first query is how the figures are fudged. More people in work schemes or 0-hour contracts?
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    setmefree2 wrote: »

    I listened to that. He said Britain would be part of the CETA deal because we're part of the EU.

    He was at pains to avoid any hint that a UK Canada deal would (or wouldn't) be on the cards in the future.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wotsthat wrote: »



    He was at pains to avoid any hint that a UK Canada deal would (or wouldn't) be on the cards in the future.



    'Canadian Trade Agency is opening an office in London'
    "The agency is confident the UK will remain a global gateway for international business despite the short term difficulties".


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/09/17/canada-to-step-up-uk-trade-with-new-export-hub-after-brexit-vote/
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    Rinoa wrote: »
    I like the way you put forward political commentators views on twitter as evidence of fact. :rotfl:

    You want her to post an order-order.com link instead? :rotfl:
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • Rinoa
    Rinoa Posts: 2,701 Forumite
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    You want her to post an order-order.com link instead? :rotfl:

    Guido does at least give evidence of his assertions. I can understand why you don't relish that. ;)
    If I don't reply to your post,
    you're probably on my ignore list.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    Conrad wrote: »


    'Canadian Trade Agency is opening an office in London'
    "The agency is confident the UK will remain a global gateway for international business despite the short term difficulties".


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/09/17/canada-to-step-up-uk-trade-with-new-export-hub-after-brexit-vote/

    Surprised they didn't have a London office already given Canada is the UK's third largest trading partner.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    POST TRUTH-AGE
    Treasury, May 2016;
    “There is a clear central conclusion, a VOTE to leave would represent an immediate and profound shock to the economy, that shock would push the economy into recession, and add 500,000 to the unemployed number"
  • Yamumuk
    Yamumuk Posts: 119 Forumite
    As an adjunct to Brexit and Trumps election has the same sentiment - blame - it is worth considering this.

    http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/chomsky-trumps-win-puts-government-in-the-hands-of-the-most-dangerous-organization-in-world-history/

    Bad decisions will have deep consequences.

    Today I become a prepper, we are at the beginning of the end, sad times.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 16 November 2016 at 3:26PM
    Yamumuk wrote: »


    we are at the beginning of the end, sad times.



    Paul Ehrlich – The End Of Affluence – 1974 – ‘the age of scarcity has arrived’. ‘We are facing the disintegration of nation states……..by the year 2000 the UK will be a group of impoverished islands’. ‘This global new dark age may well see the end of civilisation’.

    From the most widely used Economics textbook of the 1960’s ‘Economics: An Introductory Analysis’ by Economist Paul Samuelson – told us the USSR would overtake the US in economic power by 1997. By 1997 the USSR did not exist

    Alvin Toffler in 1970 wrote a best seller that warned of ‘Future Shock’, that the Human brain would not cope with the pace of change. By 1979 he told us global riots would have bought civilisation to a standstill.



    1967 – William and Paul Paddock – published ‘Famine 1975’ which predicted global famines


    1968 Paul Borlaug – the father of the green revolution warned of the impending doom and global famine just around the corner


    Knight – Riddle Newspaper chain 1974 ran a 4 part series on the end of civilisation. ‘a host of powerful forces has come together to shake the very foundations of civilisation’


    Richard Faulk – Princeton University in ‘This Endangered Planet’ – wrote ‘people will increasingly doubt whether life is worth living, the 1990’s will witness the era of catastrophe and the 21st Century would be the era of annihilation’


    Desmond King-Hele, the British scientist writer in ‘The End Of The Twentieth Century’ wrote – ‘has man a future? Probably not – or at the least disasterous’


    Valery Giscard d’Estaing wrote ‘the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse had arrived’


    International Panel chaired by Willy Brandt (former German Chancellor told us - ‘the 1980’s could witness greater tragedies than the 1930’s



  • Rinoa wrote: »
    I like the way you put forward political commentators views on twitter as evidence of fact. :rotfl:
    The link was to Bloomberg. The guys on Twitter are pointing out the context in terms of German domestic politics and Merkel on FOM/Benefits.

    It was benefits she was talking about, not major concessions on FOM.
    It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
    But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.