Free the 4000

bod1467

pappa_golf wrote: »

more red matron ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

This confirms to me who PG's alter ego was.

Northlakes

There is the Traffic Penalty Tribunal which is already set up for Council charges.

From personal experience I can tell you it works very well and is very efficient.

I do get the feeling though that they would have one mighty clash with private parking industry as they are sticklers for the law and correct procedures.

I'm afraid the occupiers of Red Cow Yard would end up as snorting raging bulls when faced with the TPT.

beamerguy

Northlakes wrote: »

There is the Traffic Penalty Tribunal which is already set up for Council charges.

From personal experience I can tell you it works very well and is very efficient.

I do get the feeling though that they would have one mighty clash with private parking industry as they are sticklers for the law and correct procedures.

I'm afraid the occupiers of Red Cow Yard would end up as snorting raging bulls when faced with the TPT.

Yes TPT are good and fair.

Yes they are a stickler for the law which the BPA and IPC are not neither are the PPC's

It would kill off the Red Cow Yard mobsters which everyone looks forward to

Redx

I think we can safely state that Wright Hassell (right hassle) are now looking into these "on hold" popla appeals given to them by the BPA

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5445602

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5445498

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5273210

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5445683

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5205259

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5445843

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5446138

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5446096

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5167958

so if anybody else is in doubt of what happened to their old POPLA case that was put on hold pending the Beavis case, its now with WH

pranksters blog linked below

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/wright-hassall-begin-to-hear-stayed.html

beamerguy

Redx wrote: »

I think we can safely state that Wright Hassell (right hassle) are now looking into these "on hold" popla appeals given to them by the BPA

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5445602

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5445498

so if anybody else is in doubt of what happened to their old POPLA case that was put on hold pending the Beavis case, its now with WH

YES, the Wright Hassall lot who will now pretend to adjudicate these long overdue cases with the left hand ... but send threatening letters on behalf of a PPC with the right hand.

The BPA who let this lot in, should be terminated as they have badly let the public down. Troy is clearly very dumb struck with such a stupid decision ..... probably he is just dumb anyway

soton_25

My WH case got transferred to London Councils due to conflict of interest...

Umkomaas

soton_25 wrote: »

My WH case got transferred to London Councils due to conflict of interest...

Do you have any idea as to what the conflict of interest is?

Which parking company?

bod1467

OP's own thread.

Umkomaas

Cheers bod, just spotted it!

Edna_Basher

Hi soton_25

I think you mean that your WH case has been transferred to Ombudsman Services POPLA rather than London Councils.

We've also received a letter from Ombudsman Services regarding an old Premier Park case from July 2015 - it looks like WH must still be doing debt collection work for Premier Park, hence the conflict of interest.

Although it's good news that WH won't be dealing with your case, if you take a look at Ombudsman Services' letter, you'll see that their proposed process is not consistent with what the BPA had promised the 4,000. Their proposal is as follows:

• Premier Park have 21 days to submit a case file containing any information it holds relating to your Appeal.
• You will then be allowed 14 days to comment on the information provided by Premier Park
• POPLA will then review the information provided and issue their decision
• Ombudsman Services' letter states that POPLA's decision shall be "final and binding".

This process allows no opportunity for appellants to add new points to their original appeal (as had been promised by the BPA). Instead, they are limited only to responding to the operator's submission (mirroring the rebuttal stage in the normal POPLA appeal process).

Also, the statement that POPLA's decision shall be final and binding is extremely misleading to the appellant - POPLA's decision is final and binding only on the operator, not the appellant.