PCN Notice Greenford / otter road yellow box

Car_54

Edwood_Woodwood wrote: »

It is an alleged moving traffic contravention, still images mean jot.

Really? That will come as news to the thousands convicted of speeding and red light offences on the basis of still images.

wealdroam

AdrianC wrote: »

wealdroam wrote: »

And we simply don't know whether that exists or not.

Given that the OP received the penalty, and doesn't dispute it's him in his car, I think it's fairly safe to say that there IS accurate evidence of the registration.

Of course the council were able see the registration, as, as you say, without that vital information the OP would not have been contacted at all.

I was only commenting on whether another video exists or not, as our friend seems to think there must be.

AdrianC

wealdroam wrote: »

Of course the council were able see the registration, as, as you say, without that vital information the OP would not have been contacted at all.

Given that we're dealing with Eddy's warped reality, all bets are off.

dannyrst

AdrianC wrote: »

Given that we're dealing with Eddy's warped reality, all bets are off.

Where you can drive through other vehicles, change lanes safely in heavy traffic without indicating and not read a number plate but still know how to get in touch with the owner of a car.

Edwood_Woodwood

wealdroam wrote: »

And we simply don't know whether that exists or not.
.

Grasping at straws here member!

Edwood_Woodwood

AdrianC wrote: »

Given that we're dealing with Eddy's warped reality, all bets are off.

Abusive post reported.

Edwood_Woodwood

wealdroam wrote: »

Of course the council were able see the registration, as, as you say, without that vital information the OP would not have been contacted at all.

You really are quite astonishing.

It's not the case the council have seen the reg, it is they have to show proof the car is what they claim it to be.

The footage does not show that.

Game over.

dannyrst

Edwood_Woodwood wrote: »

You really are quite astonishing.

It's not the case the council have seen the reg, it is they have to show proof the car is what they claim it to be.

The footage does not show that.

Game over.

prove the car is a car?

Edwood_Woodwood

wealdroam wrote: »

I was only commenting on whether another video exists or not, as our friend seems to think there must be.

Put it this way, if this video evidence was presented to an adjudicator it wouldn't get past first base.

If's and buts mean jack.

Evidence.

Edwood_Woodwood

AdrianC wrote: »

Given that the OP received the penalty, and doesn't dispute it's him in his car, I think it's fairly safe to say that there IS accurate evidence of the registration.

What on earth are you on about?

He hasn't even appealed yet!

:doh: