We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Corbynomics: A Dystopia
Comments
-
-
ruggedtoast wrote: »There is no point whatsoever in Smith continuing this farrago. He should abandon his challenge immediately and submit to the democratic will of the membership.
Actually this is probably the most sensible outcome.
At least we'd have a bit of clarity in what the Labour Party stood for.0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »There is no point whatsoever in Smith continuing this farrago. He should abandon his challenge immediately and submit to the democratic will of the membership.
Smith at least offers a traditional Labour manifesto. If the members find that unappealing. Then the Labour party as we know it is doomed to extinction.0 -
posh*spice wrote: »Ok come on? irish Catholics killed plenty.
Yes, of course they did - I was responding to posts that only mentioned IRA terrorism and implied that protestants did not use terrorism as a tactic as well.Do not be fooled into believing that this society cannot be made fairer because hard work isn't necessarily all it takes.
There are those on MSE DT who know the price of everything but the value of little.0 -
at the end of the day one has to make one's own judgement on whether the killings were justified.
you clearly think they were.
Because the people doing the killings agreed to stop i see no reason to honour them.
so you honour them for stop killing
I don't
I do not think terrorism is ever justified whether by the IRA, UDF, Islamic State, Zionist irgun etc. Unfortunately there will always be some, at best misguided, or, at worst, psychotic people who will resort to terrorism when intractable national disputes such as NI or the creation of Israel happen.
However I do think (as I said before) that refusal of the British governments for 25 years or so to try to talk to the IRA was a mistake and possibly delayed the peace process. That is why I cannot condemn some on the left who at least tried to talk to the IRA and understand the fatal hunger strike of Bobby Sands. Personally I would not have used the word 'honour' but I don't see why it is still so contentious after twenty years. especially as he has apologised. It is possible that his words did help establish the peace process - is that not a price worth paying even it has upset some people?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/606125/John-McDonnell-IRA-Thatcher-assassination-appalling-joke-Question-Time
As I said you are indulging in political ****stirring.Do not be fooled into believing that this society cannot be made fairer because hard work isn't necessarily all it takes.
There are those on MSE DT who know the price of everything but the value of little.0 -
TheNickster wrote: »I do not think terrorism is ever justified whether by the IRA, UDF, Islamic State, Zionist irgun etc. Unfortunately there will always be some, at best misguided, or, at worst, psychotic people who will resort to terrorism when intractable national disputes such as NI or the creation of Israel happen.
However I do think (as I said before) that refusal of the British governments for 25 years or so to try to talk to the IRA was a mistake and possibly delayed the peace process. That is why I cannot condemn some on the left who at least tried to talk to the IRA and understand the fatal hunger strike of Bobby Sands. Personally I would not have used the word 'honour' but I don't see why it is still so contentious after twenty years. especially as he has apologised. It is possible that his words did help establish the peace process - is that not a price worth paying even it has upset some people?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/606125/John-McDonnell-IRA-Thatcher-assassination-appalling-joke-Question-Time
As I said you are indulging in political ****stirring.
his apology was"If I gave offence, and I clearly have, from the bottom of my heart I apologise
so an apology for offence caused?
he has another joke
what do you call 4 dead tories ?
answer 'a start'
f*** funny isn't it
so an apology for offence caused?0 -
he has another joke
what do you call 4 dead tories ?
answer 'a start'
f*** funny isn't it
so an apology for offence caused?
for heavens sake - half the population tell 'sick' jokes like that.Do not be fooled into believing that this society cannot be made fairer because hard work isn't necessarily all it takes.
There are those on MSE DT who know the price of everything but the value of little.0 -
How would you feel if Nigel Farage had made that remarks about immigrants?
McDonnell has no right, in his position, to come out with such hateful stuff.
(And why isn't it a hate crime, which it would be if Farage had sasid it\).(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
TheNickster wrote: »I do not think terrorism is ever justified whether by the IRA, UDF, Islamic State, Zionist irgun etc. Unfortunately there will always be some, at best misguided, or, at worst, psychotic people who will resort to terrorism when intractable national disputes such as NI or the creation of Israel happen.
However I do think (as I said before) that refusal of the British governments for 25 years or so to try to talk to the IRA was a mistake and possibly delayed the peace process. That is why I cannot condemn some on the left who at least tried to talk to the IRA and understand the fatal hunger strike of Bobby Sands. Personally I would not have used the word 'honour' but I don't see why it is still so contentious after twenty years. especially as he has apologised. It is possible that his words did help establish the peace process - is that not a price worth paying even it has upset some people?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/606125/John-McDonnell-IRA-Thatcher-assassination-appalling-joke-Question-Time
As I said you are indulging in political ****stirring.
although terrorism is never justified, you would reward it by holding talks immediately0 -
TheNickster wrote: »I do not think terrorism is ever justified whether by the IRA, UDF, Islamic State, Zionist irgun etc. Unfortunately there will always be some, at best misguided, or, at worst, psychotic people who will resort to terrorism when intractable national disputes such as NI or the creation of Israel happen.
Neanderthals who are basically saying "I'm going to kill you and yours until I get what I want.".
Killing policemen, prison officers, civilians also using civilians as human shields. Setting booby traps that blow limbs off RMP investigating a crime scene. Torturing people, kidnapping, ambushing minivans full of people going to/from work.
Anyone on here who sympathises with the IRA can do one as far as I'm concerned.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards