Watchdog Tonight: Troy Refuses Interview

bod1467

What complete and utter baloney from Mr. Hurley. :mad:

70% of tickets that are cancelled at that stage are done so on the basis of mitigating circumstances

1) I highly doubt that

2) 70% of what? Even if (being generous) 10% of tickets are cancelled at first appeal to PPC, that still only 7% of tickets.

3) And the IPC appeals process is laughable

And I liked how Ann had him down as Gamekeeper and Poacher.

Redx

good job his mum took him shopping now school is out, for a pair of long trousers to wear on the telly

absolute rubbish from him though , 1 out of 10 for factual knowledge

Half_way

Seemed to squirm a bit, what was the PPC featured and do they normally have such deep voices?

Ralph-y

Quote:
70% of tickets that are cancelled at that stage are done so on the basis of mitigating circumstances
1) I highly doubt that

2) 70% of what? Even if (being generous) 10% of tickets are cancelled at first appeal to PPC, that still only 7% of tickets.

3) And the IPC appeals process is laughable

I heard that bit .... re wound back (just an oldie phrase ...how do you re wind digital things/)

he seamed to say that of the appeals to the IPA 70 % where allowed on mitigating circumstances ..... which may be right .... allow a few through so as not to allow a precedent ? or am I seeing it wrong? look back at a some of the surprise wins ......

Even some one as thick as my self would have picked holes in his statements:eek:

Ralph:cool:

Umkomaas

Anyone hazard a guess as to who the PPC is where the undercover reporter was working?

I think I saw a PE NtK just before they crossed to the undercover part. Deafeningly silent on naming and shaming - unlike the aerial man who clearly wouldn't have the wonga backup to take Watchdog through any legal process!

ColliesCarer

Troy might be regretting not taking part.

Even he might have come out on top in comparison with the supercilious little slimeball

trisontana

As usual he trotted out the old excuse that it's all the fault of the motorist and if it wasn't for the wonderful PPCs the whole world would descend into chaos.

Umkomaas

Ralph-y wrote: »

I heard that bit .... re wound back (just an oldie phrase ...how do you re wind digital things/)

he seamed to say that of the appeals to the IPA 70 % where allowed on mitigating circumstances ..... which may be right .... allow a few through so as not to allow a precedent ? or am I seeing it wrong? look back at a some of the surprise wins ......

Even some one as thick as my self would have picked holes in his statements:eek:

Ralph:cool:

I think the underlying (note the third and fourth syllables of my preceding word) point was relating to appeals to the actual PPCs (not the IAS - as we well know) - of all appeals allowed, 70% were based on mitigating circumstances.

Don't forget that 70% of the square root of FA, is (drum roll) - FA. Lies, damned lies and statistics!

ColliesCarer

Umkomaas wrote: »

Anyone hazard a guess as to who the PPC is where the undercover reporter was working?

I think I saw a PE NtK just before they crossed to the undercover part. Deafeningly silent on naming and shaming - unlike the aerial man who clearly wouldn't have the wonga backup to take Watchdog through any legal process!

Dunno but Anne seemed to indicate it was one of Hurley's members

bod1467

Umkomaas wrote: »

Don't forget that 70% of the square root of FA, is (drum roll) - FA. Lies, lies and damned statistics!

They should have asked how many actual tickets 70% represented. And if he said he didn't know then the question would be "Well how do you know it's 70%"?