We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Stock Markets Bombing!
Comments
-
Bonds are up, apparently.Errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. - Jefferson0
-
I'm always amazed how so many people consider property to be the surest bet over the long term, so I did some digging.
The Halifax house index and the FTSE100 share index were both re-based (or actually based) in 1983. The house one on January 1st of that year and the stock index on December 31st of that year.
The Halifax index is now at 643.8 an increase of 543.8%.
The FTSE is now at 6200 an increase of 520%.
However the stock index excludes dividend payments which would have brought an average income of approx 3% per year plus the stock index was based 12 months after the house index.
PS. The FTSE100 in that time has one correction (1987) and one major downturn (2000-2003) whereas the housing index only has the one downturn (that of 1990-1995)
And, of course, the dividend from your house is a home (approximately equivalent to the rental value). Probably equating to 3% minimum.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote: »And, of course, the dividend from your house is a home (approximately equivalent to the rental value). Probably equating to 3% minimum.

GG
What about the costs of ownership? Isnt that somewhere about 1-2% PA?
Ie fixing the roof, new kitchen etc.0 -
Dow down on concern that retail sales are taking a knock as indebted (and bankrupt) consumers cut their spending on consumer goods. It's all about contagion.
BTL is a business not an investment. Cashflow not yield is the way to measure it.
Home ownership has intagible benefits that it is very hard to put a monetary value on.0 -
Spot on Generali and bettter put than my offering.
BTL should not be confused with property investment. I bought a property to let out. House price fluctuations are incidental.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
So would I be right in saying that the ECB doesn't actually hold any money in what I would understand as the traditional meaning of a bank?
I'm assuming they are more along the lines of a money brokerage, placing one banks money on the market (that happens to be having good cashflow) to help those that maybe don't.
Or am I being a little too simplistic?
One thing I realised some time ago is that none of these businesses play with their own money:rolleyes:0 -
-
So would I be right in saying that the ECB doesn't actually hold any money in what I would understand as the traditional meaning of a bank?
I'm assuming they are more along the lines of a money brokerage, placing one banks money on the market (that happens to be having good cashflow) to help those that maybe don't.
To speak in general terms, a Central Bank can create money in its own currency. The Cental Bank of Furrinstanzland (the CBF) can create money by buying back bonds it has previously issued. In doing so the CBE borrows money and then creates money from thin air to pay that debt back (in the modern world of electronically held deposits it doesn't even need to buy paper and ink!).
Cashflow doesn't come into it when you can create and destroy money.
At the moment what the ECB (not to be confused with the CBF) is doing is creating money, lending it overnight or for a week to 'normal' banks in exchange for its own bonds (thus creating money) and then swapping them back again (thus destroying the money it created).
This is a pretty complicated topic and I'm really struggling to descibe it in simple terms - I'm a banker not a teacher dammit! A Central Bank has several functions: preserve the value of the currency, be lender of last resort, preserve the integrety of the financial system amongst them.
I'll see if google can turn up something helpful to y'all.0 -
You were starting to lose me there but I get the gist of what you're saying.
I was reasonably sure somewhere along the line there was "Made up money" I've just never fully understood where this virtual money came from...you covered enough of that for me not to want to ask any more questions, certainly not if I don't want to be baffled!
Still find it all interesting though.0 -
Hope I helped. If you want to know more then ask more or (better) get a simple economics text book out of the library. Hopefully that will be something written by someone paid to write rather than a dilletante like me.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards