Ebay Dispute/Return Query

campdave

pulliptears wrote: »

Hence my post saying I was also in the accept the return camp...

But I wasn't quoting your post. It looked like the post I was quoting was suggesting my only advice was to offer a partial refund, which is advice I would never give.

techspec

JethroUK wrote: »

Yeap what he said!

Its a bit rich wanting any come back after 3 weeks on some old toys - court/law would kick them out of the court

But if you feel you have to then ask for the whole lot back or kiss my @$$

What's this eBay thug thinking?

Oh yeah hope you gave them a big fat neg whilst you think it over

Use Ebay much do you? - sellers cannot leave bad feedback

campdave

techspec wrote: »

Use Ebay much do you? - sellers cannot leave bad feedback

Is that opinion or fact?

techspec

campdave wrote: »

Is that opinion or fact?

Fact - unless you found a magic way to leave a neg?

campdave

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5063322

pulliptears

campdave wrote: »

But I wasn't quoting your post. It looked like the post I was quoting was suggesting my only advice was to offer a partial refund, which is advice I would never give.

Are you reading the same thread as I am? I didn't say you quoted me, in fact my only inference to your post was an agreement not to give a partial refund.

You are making a big deal out of something that isn't there....

campdave

pulliptears wrote: »

Are you reading the same thread as I am? I didn't say you quoted me, in fact my only inference to your post was an agreement not to give a partial refund.

You are making a big deal out of something that isn't there....

I'm not looking for an argument.

I quoted theonlywayisup's post as it looked to me as if they were implying I was advocating a partial refund.

You quoted my response to them, which I found confusing.

My response to your post was to clarify my position.

Re-reading it now, I can possibly see you were backing me up, but it's not how I read it originally - to be honest, I found the winky smiley a little sarcastic when I originally read it, but that's the internet I guess.

Anyway, I guess we can say we are both in agreement.

pulliptears

campdave wrote: »

I'm not looking for an argument.

I quoted theonlywayisup's post as it looked to me as if they were implying I was advocating a partial refund.

You quoted my response to them, which I found confusing.

My response to your post was to clarify my position.

Re-reading it now, I can possibly see you were backing me up, but it's not how I read it originally - to be honest, I found the winky smiley a little sarcastic when I originally read it, but that's the internet I guess.

Anyway, I guess we can say we are both in agreement.

Dave, I owe you an apology. I'd misread the quote as mine (reading on a phone, now on a computer), you weren't quoting me

I am 100% in agreement with you, I'm firmly in the 'all or nothing' camp with eBay as there are far too many chancers trying the partial trick.

Anyway, apologies again Dave. Moving on... :D

campdave

Apology accepted! Didn't know what I'd done wrong.

Makes sense now.

pulliptears

campdave wrote: »

Apology accepted! Didn't know what I'd done wrong.

Makes sense now.

It will teach me to not skim read on my phone