EE/Orange/T-Mobile - Reclaim ALL price rises AND cancel contract re T&C change - 2

Mikmonken

Counter claim... For what their time? That's ridiculous

sick_of_paying_more

Mikmonken wrote: »

Counter claim... For what their time? That's ridiculous

They threatened this If I went ahead with the claim they are claiming for a strike out and summary judgment I assume that is what is implied never mind I have something up my sleeve if it gets that far!! Watch this space!!

Mikmonken

I think they're just inferring there is some kind of technicality flaw in your claim to get the court to kick it out. I used this when I was sued because the claimant failed to submit any evidence to back up what he was saying, at worst you'd just have to pay your own costs I think.

barrowvian

EE filed their acknowledgement of service today, to give them 28 days to respond as opposed to the original 14.

Sick_of_paying_more ... How long did they leave it before providing you with their defence?

sick_of_paying_more

barrowvian wrote: »

EE filed their acknowledgement of service today, to give them 28 days to respond as opposed to the original 14.

Sick_of_paying_more ... How long did they leave it before providing you with their defence?

It was about the 25 th day!!! Just waiting for the court to sort out a hearing date!! Will keep you informed

sick_of_paying_more

Mikmonken wrote: »

I think they're just inferring there is some kind of technicality flaw in your claim to get the court to kick it out. I used this when I was sued because the claimant failed to submit any evidence to back up what he was saying, at worst you'd just have to pay your own costs I think.

I'm just hoping the court see sense on the day!! Im just hoping the court see plain English and not some waffle by EE!! Here's hoping!!

RandomCurve

sick_of_paying_more wrote: »

It was about the 25 th day!!! Just waiting for the court to sort out a hearing date!! Will keep you informed

So the court have accepted the case?
EEs first line of defence (as was O2s) is to try and get the case struck off due to technicalities, mostly of the time pretend you have not "made a case", "it is not clear what you are referring to", "the amount is too small and is a waste the court time", "it has already been to arbitration".
What they tend NOT to do is address the points raised with counter arguments!


Good luck

Mikmonken

jocklatic wrote: »

Sadly Joej being slightly cynical & from what has gone on previously with CISAS / EE , i have a feeling you may well have to wait up until the last minute to enable as much collusion as possible between these 2 bed partners & no doubt the outcome will suit EE!!! I hope i am wrong & you become another winner against Effluent Everywhere:D

If you get a chance don't forget to chase CISAS asking if EE have requested an extension. They should say yes or no, follow it up with a quick email to confirm what they've said in the call, and then tomorrow when EE magically get an extension complain that they hadn't responded within 10 days.

you're not being awkward with this, what EE have done which has lead to you raising this claim, is breach the UTCCR’s if this is the case as everything we have points to the fact they have.

the text message they sent “the notification” omitted key information that would have informed your decision in terminating your contract, do you get more clarity from knowing that your increase is capped at RPI or capped at the lowest index price, personally I don’t but did they even mention that in the text message? No would that be key in your decision making process? You’d probably look into it would you?

I’ll let you Google the punishment behind a breach in UTCCRs but needless to say EE will be doing whatever they can to wriggle out of anyone proving that they’ve breached UTCCRs, and at this point in time CISAS absolutely don’t want EE to stop using them for ADR they’re the cash cow at the moment.

sick_of_paying_more

RandomCurve wrote: »

So the court have accepted the case?
EEs first line of defence (as was O2s) is to try and get the case struck off due to technicalities, mostly of the time pretend you have not "made a case", "it is not clear what you are referring to", "the amount is too small and is a waste the court time", "it has already been to arbitration".
What they tend NOT to do is address the points raised with counter arguments!


Good luck

Rc
Still waiting for court date they don't Rush these things!! Will refer back to you then!!

RandomCurve

sick_of_paying_more wrote: »

Rc
Still waiting for court date they don't Rush these things!! Will refer back to you then!!

To right they don't - I've been helping someone with an O2 case - we submitted the Letter Before Action late March and the hearing is scheduled for 7th November.


Should be an interesting case as if we win then then ALL O2 folk can claim back previous price rises, and it will bode well for you EE folk!