Parking eye ikea nottingham

stampede

Half_way wrote: »

I have visited this site, and i can confrim that it is a bod in a high vis parking eye coat/jacket walking round, or when I was last there he sitting down having a snooze.
the car parks cover a huge area, although theres only one exit/entrance ( as far as i know)

There is another entrance/exit next to BHS, which is not as well known, it brings you out on the same road just the other side of Screwfix.

The_Slithy_Tove

ducatidaz wrote: »

It's definitely PE.
I have emailed Ikea, and although "sympathetic" surprise surprise they can't do anything.

Contact them again, speak to the manager and demand to know why IKEA are lieing to you. The lie being that the "can't do anything." Yes they can. They are the principal. PE are their poodles. The can do something if they want to.

bazster

It's like all those signs you see all over the place stating "XYZ Ltd. regrets that it can accept no responsibility for..."

Lie. The truth would be "XYZ Ltd. regrets that it refuses to accept responsibility for..."

ducatidaz

Anyway, back to the original question. I need to wait for the Notice to Keeper before sending my appeal?

Umkomaas

ducatidaz wrote: »

Anyway, back to the original question. I need to wait for the Notice to Keeper before sending my appeal?

Correct - unless it was a company car, courtesy car or hire car.

ducatidaz

Well my Notice to Keeper has finally arrived, better get on with my appeal. The photo supplied by them does not show any obstruction whatsover, should i put that in my first appeal?

Redx

add it as a point d) but DO NOT DISCLOSE or infer who was driving, so do not use the dreaded small word I

THE DRIVER is the correct term, as in "The driver did this"

ducatidaz

First draft.

The Registered Keeper of the above vehicle denies any liability for the unenforceable charge detailed in the above Parking Charge Notice.

The charge does not represent any form of loss and as such it is punitive and a therefore a PENALTY. The photograph supplied does not in any way demonstrate “unauthorised” or “obstructive parking”.
Furthermore 'the driver' did not enter into any contract whatsoever and saw no signs because they are not prominent enough and so are not compliant with the BPA code of practice and therefore no contract was formed between the driver and yourselves at all.

Confirm acceptance of this challenge and cancel the charge, or provide a POPLA verification code where a vigorous and robust challenge will be mounted.

No further correspondence will be entered into with you on this matter. If nothing further from you is received within 35 days of the date of this letter it will be assumed the challenge is accepted and the charge cancelled.

Failure to send a POPLA code would be a breach of the BPA Code of Practice. Be advised that failure to comply with a code of conduct to which you have committed would be an offence under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and I would not hesitate to report such a breach to the BPA, DVLA and Trading Standards.

Yours faithfully

Umkomaas

Why have you decided not to use the template initial appeal in the NEWBIE sticky? It covers all bases, and flags up to PE that you are being assisted by the forum.

Of late, PE have been procrastinating by asking for more information before issuing a POPLA code; they may get on with things a bit faster if they know you're getting forum advice.

Your call even so.

ducatidaz

Where abouts do I find the template?