📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ASDA - Cheese Toastie Complaint.

Options
1234689

Comments

  • meer53
    meer53 Posts: 10,217 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ithomso1 wrote: »
    Ooo - I can just imagine the sequel - Probably a much bigger budget too!

    On another note, I think that some of the people that are being rather targeted with their opinion of me may be being slightly harsh in their estimation of me.

    Its a shame I don't have the operational guidelines for how much cheese should be used.

    It's simple. If the cheese gets into the electrical part of the toaster, you're using too much.
  • ithomso1
    ithomso1 Posts: 42 Forumite
    meer53 wrote: »
    It's simple. If the cheese gets into the electrical part of the toaster, you're using too much.

    Are you familiar with the exact sandwich maker in question?

    I believe spillage over the sides of a sandwich maker is unavoidable. Although its strange there was no mention of beans in ASDA's report....

    Maybe they're ok in the compartment.
  • Azari wrote: »
    I think we can be pretty certain that OP's RCD fulfilled its design function impeccably. :D

    A vent about people not testing safety equipment probably deserves a thread of its own.

    The thing is, it didn't fulfil its function correctly.
    If it had, it would have tripped and then then have been able to have been reset with no damage to itself.

    My post wasn't a vent about simply not testing the RCD.
    One of the reasons for carrying out the test is to work the mechanical mechanism of the device to ensure that it hasn't seized up. It hadn't been tested for at least 3 years (and possibly far longer), and if the mechanical trip mechanism was seized or stiff through not being operated on a regular basis (as recommended by all RCD manufacturers), the problem is one entirely of the OP's own making.
  • ithomso1
    ithomso1 Posts: 42 Forumite
    The thing is, it didn't fulfil its function correctly.
    If it had, it would have tripped and then then have been able to have been reset with no damage to itself.

    My post wasn't a vent about simply not testing the RCD.
    One of the reasons for carrying out the test is to work the mechanical mechanism of the device to ensure that it hasn't seized up. It hadn't been tested for at least 3 years (and possibly far longer), and if the mechanical trip mechanism was seized or stiff through not being operated on a regular basis (as recommended by all RCD manufacturers), the problem is one entirely of the OP's own making.

    Cheers for the advice RE Testing. Something i'll probably now integrate into when i'm taking the electricity meter readings :)

    Regards,
  • pinkteapot
    pinkteapot Posts: 8,044 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 16 July 2014 at 12:52PM
    stevemLS wrote: »
    I was really hoping this was going to be one of those mad threads that occasionally come up - about a poor cheese toastie.

    I could almost smell the meatballs.

    Imagine my disappointment when I see some techie discussion about RCDs - about which I know nothing.

    Oh well, sure a mad one will be along before long.

    Given that all the nutty complaints on here seem to be about Asda, I was hoping for a thread where OP had burnt their mouth while tucking into a cheese toastie in an Asda cafe. :(

    Asda's entirely serious comments about "release the toaster" did make me chuckle though.
  • ithomso1
    ithomso1 Posts: 42 Forumite
    pinkteapot wrote: »
    Given that all the nutty complaints on here seem to be about Asda, I was hoping for a thread where OP had burnt their mouth while tucking into a cheese toastie in an Asda cafe. :(

    Challenge Accepted.
  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ithomso1 wrote: »
    I believe spillage over the sides of a sandwich maker is unavoidable.

    Really?
    How did you come to that conclusion?
    Of course it is avoidable.

    I would suggest that a more correct statement would be:
    "spillage over the sides of a sandwich maker is unavoidable if it is overfilled".
  • ithomso1
    ithomso1 Posts: 42 Forumite
    wealdroam wrote: »
    Really?
    How did you come to that conclusion?
    Of course it is avoidable.

    I would suggest that a more correct statement would be:
    "spillage over the sides of a sandwich maker is unavoidable if it is overfilled".

    Spillage in tasty toasties is unavoidable. Overfilled is a subjective statement.
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,483 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As I just wrote (more or less) on another, similar thread:-

    A piece of advice: if your tone & misunderstanding on this thread is anything to go by, it's not surprising that you feel that companies are taking advantage of you, nor that you get frustrated by it. There is no substitute for understanding the rules, and using the rules against them, if necessary. It will save much hassle in the long-run.

    The legal position is very simple. The toastie-maker has been refunded. That ends the issue of a claim for the toastie-maker itself. And it also ends any prospect of forcing Asda to return the toastie-maker to you.

    Separately, there may be a claim for damages resulting from the use of the toastie-maker. You will need to prove that the damage was caused by a defect in the toastie-maker, and that the toastie-maker was not and had not been misused in such a way as to cause or exacerbate said defect.

    I suspect any claim for damages has a limited chance of success. If you want to take it further without legal expense, the appropriate route is to Trading Standards.

    A toast, if I may.... I'll get my coat.
  • ithomso1
    ithomso1 Posts: 42 Forumite
    Cornucopia wrote: »
    As I just wrote (more or less) on another, similar thread:-

    A piece of advice: if your tone & misunderstanding on this thread is anything to go by, it's not surprising that you feel that companies are taking advantage of you, nor that you get frustrated by it. There is no substitute for understanding the rules, and using the rules against them, if necessary. It will save much hassle in the long-run.

    The legal position is very simple. The toastie-maker has been refunded. That ends the issue of a claim for the toastie-maker itself. And it also ends any prospect of forcing Asda to return the toastie-maker to you.

    Separately, there may be a claim for damages resulting from the use of the toastie-maker. You will need to prove that the damage was caused by a defect in the toastie-maker, and that the toastie-maker was not and had not been misused in such a way as to cause or exacerbate said defect.

    I suspect any claim for damages has a limited chance of success. If you want to take it further without legal expense, the appropriate route is to Trading Standards.

    A toast, if I may.... I'll get my coat.

    Trading standards informed.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.