IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Private PCN - No reply to my appeal after 3 months, then...

Options
1235789

Comments

  • brutal_deluxe
    brutal_deluxe Posts: 183 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 19 February 2014 at 2:09PM
    Thanks!!! Ok so here it is again then. Is there any harm at all including the last bit about not being given sufficient opportunity to pay the reduced amount even if the charge was enforceable? I really feel strongly about this and look at it as a sort of safety net to at least lower the charge if for any reason the appeal is refused. Anything else I could include to bolster the appeal before I fire it off?
    ************

    After a further review, the Registered Keeper wishes to appeal against the Penalty Charge Notice notice on the following grounds:

    1/ No authority to issue tickets
    It is disputed that the SmartPark LTD has a right to issue tickets on the land in question. The Registered Keeper requests to be provided with a copy of the contract between SmartPark LTD and the landowner/landholder that provides the necessary contractual written authority for the issue and enforcement of the Parking Charge Notice.

    2/ Creditor identity
    The Parking Charge Notice and Notice to Keeper simply mentions SmartPark LTD. The Registered Keeper requests to know who the actual creditor is making this £80 parking charge demand. It has not been disclosed exactly who is making the claim and in what capacity.

    3/ No contract
    With relation to the on-site signage (specifically the entry sign), it leaves insufficient opportunity for the driver to safely review all contractual information before deciding to enter the car park. Furthermore, even if there was a contract, which has yet to be proven, then it is unfair as defined in the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.

    4/ The charge is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss, or is punitive or unreasonable
    The appellant believes that the £80 charge is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss or is punitive or unreasonable in proportion to the alleged parking contravention, and is therefore not enforceable. If the latter, to charge £80 for the alleged 16 minute overstay is grossly disproportionate to the £1/hr fee. The appellant requires SmartPark LTD to provide a detailed breakdown of how the amount of the charge was calculated solely in relation to this instance. The appellant is aware from Court rulings and previous POPLA adjudications that the cost of running the business may not be included in these pre-estimates of loss.

    Furthermore, even if the charge was enforceable, SmartPark LTD failed to acknowledge receipt of the original appeal or return a decision. The appellant was thus never given opportunity to pay the reduced amount, despite making beyond reasonable effort to follow appeal instructions as set out on the reverse of the Penalty Charge Notice. (Electronic proof is available that the appeal email was correctly sent to the address provided) In any case, it is unreasonable that the appellant be held liable for the amount.


    This concludes the appeal.

    ******************
  • PS also found this in another successful appeal, worth putting in, in case they argue that the amount was contractual?:

    Please note that The BPA have stated categorically that private parking charges do not attract VAT (based on the VCS -v- HMRC 2013 appeal decision) and therefore it follows that private parking charges cannot be a contractual matter, and can only represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss. A private parking company cannot allege a contract exists on the one hand (for POPLA and for the public) and yet suggest it's non-contractual and therefore a non-VAT matter (for HMRC). If it is a true Parking Charge, then the keeper will also require a VAT invoice.
  • kirkbyinfurnesslad_2
    kirkbyinfurnesslad_2 Posts: 2,340 Forumite
    edited 19 February 2014 at 3:17PM
    No the last bit is completely irrelevant. It is no safety net at all as you would have no reason to pay even if u lost


    Apart from that, the rest is fine. Just put issue no 4 first though
    Proud to be a member of the Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Gang.:D:T
  • OK thanks, gonna press on then. You reckon its worth adding to the GPEoL the bit about parking charges not being a contractual matter? Thought it might cover another base?
  • No what you have got initially is enough to win
    Proud to be a member of the Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Gang.:D:T
  • Thanks all! I'll be sure to let you know of the result.
  • Can this OP confirm which parking company this is? In post #4 it is creative now it is Smart??????
  • Sorry. Trying to obscure the details!
  • QUESTION:

    According to the Ts and Cs, the car park claims a contractually agreed sum, not that of damages etc. In my appeal, I only refer to GPEoL. Is this going to be a problem?
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    I'm not reading the whole thread again ... hasn't this already been covered? Some PPCs try to dress it up as a contractual charge but they always slip up somewhere in their wording.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.