Stay Away from PLAYTRADE

mugheeth

PlayTrade being involved in tax evasion and vat evasion! wow

wealdroam

mugheeth wrote: »

They are required to.Moreover,there are 'issues' of tax evasion(business being in jersey)and VAT Evasion.Recently,'it was found that Starbucks did not pay Income tax since 2009'

This is being investigated against PlayTrade(tax and VAT evasion)

I think you would be more correct if you used the term tax avoidance.

imoneyop

mugheeth wrote: »

The bye-laws place a duty on firms to investigate complaints. The duty includes the requirement that:

• a firm must ensure that all new clients are made aware in writing of the principal to be contacted in the event of their wishing to complain about the firm's services and of their right to complain to the Institute;
• if a firm receives a complaint concerning the services it has provided or failed to provide to a client or former client, it must immediately cause the complaint to be investigated by a principal; and
• if, following such an investigation, the firm is of the opinion that the complaint is justified in whole or in part, it must do whatever is appropriate to resolve the complaint, whether by way of remedial work, apology, the provision of information, the return of books or documents, the reduction or repayment of fees, or otherwise.

Now you've just proved yourself to not have a clue what you are talking about. That is a copy and paste from the ICAEW rules - I don't think Play.com are registered as accountants :rotfl:.

mugheeth

wealdroam wrote: »

I think you would be more correct if you used the term tax avoidance.

tax avoidance which is even worse(criminal) remember starbucks? who did not pay 'any' income tax since 2009:(

wealdroam

mugheeth wrote: »

The bye-laws place a duty on firms to investigate complaints. The duty includes the requirement that:

• a firm must ensure that all new clients are made aware in writing of the principal to be contacted in the event of their wishing to complain about the firm's services and of their right to complain to the Institute;
• if a firm receives a complaint concerning the services it has provided or failed to provide to a client or former client, it must immediately cause the complaint to be investigated by a principal; and
• if, following such an investigation, the firm is of the opinion that the complaint is justified in whole or in part, it must do whatever is appropriate to resolve the complaint, whether by way of remedial work, apology, the provision of information, the return of books or documents, the reduction or repayment of fees, or otherwise.

Please tell us what you are quoting from.

Is that UK Bye-laws or Jersey Bye-laws?

mugheeth

mugheeth wrote: »

tax avoidance which is even worse(criminal) remember starbucks? who did not pay 'any' income tax since 2009:(

It is a duty of a company to place the complaints procedure in place,it is a must.every one knows that.It is even mentioned in money saving forums

wealdroam

mugheeth wrote: »

tax avoidance which is even worse(criminal) remember starbucks? who did not pay 'any' income tax since 2009:(

No. No. No. You've got it the wrong way round.

Tax evasion is illegal.

Tax avoidance is a perfectly legitimate method of reducing one's tax bill.

imoneyop

mugheeth wrote: »

tax avoidance which is even worse(criminal)

Oh dear, keep on digging - your ability to write crap is getting better and better.

imoneyop

mugheeth wrote: »

It is a duty of a company to place the complaints procedure in place,it is a must.every one knows that.It is even mentioned in money saving forums

Still waiting for you to provide a valid source to back this up.

RichardD1970

[URL="[URL=http://www.smileyvault.com/][IMG]http://www.smileyvault.com/albums/userpics/13049/popcorn.gif[/IMG][/URL]"][/url]