We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Benefits Street

1161719212226

Comments

  • Now this I find very annoying...

    The correct adverb is "worrying".
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    zarf2007 wrote: »
    money destined for people who needed it, so much for her upstanding character....
    Would you say the same about people who avoid paying tax - they are taking money destined for people who needed it?
    I am struggling to reconcile your assertions the money was destined for people who needed it, with your assertions the Government wastes taxpayers money
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The next big benefits change is means testing the state pension, so expect any savings or private pensions to reduce your state provision by its value. You've been warned.


    Naturally, you have a reliable source for this 'information,' though you have chosen not to quote it.

    I understand. ;)
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    Hooloovoo wrote: »
    ... and if you saw that they did have money from somewhere to waste on beer and fags, you'd rightly boot them out onto the street for taking advantage of your hospitality.

    are you suggesting that if the Government sees a woman smoking or drinking they should 'boot' her and her children out on the street?
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    Davesnave wrote: »
    Naturally, you have a reliable source for this 'information,' though you have chosen not to quote it.

    I understand. ;)

    Somebody might have suggested it, but I can't see it happening.
    Old people get the best deal because most of them vote.
    Why else do they pay less tax on the same income for example, then get freebies like free prescriptions and subsidized travel that younger people don't get even when they need it to get to work?
    No Government dare upset the Grey Vote.
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    Regardless of what you do or don't do, if there is a benefits system for people not in work, some people will ensure they can't work so that they can claim benefits if at all possible.

    We either don't have a benefit system or accept some level of abuse. Personally I would rather the government focus on educating kids to have aspirations beyond signing on, than starting a witch hunt against the poor for little gain.

    David Cameron, Nick Clegg and their friends all went to similar schools. The people on Benefits Street all went to similar schools.

    It is unrealistic to expect all of one group of people to succeed when they are set up to fail from the moment they are born.
  • David Cameron, Nick Clegg and their friends all went to similar schools. The people on Benefits Street all went to similar schools.

    The key is probably the parenting, rather than the schools. Primary schools maybe, but so much is set by the time people get to secondary school.

    As the jesuit saying goes, give me a boy until he is seven, and I will give you the man.
  • CWSmith
    CWSmith Posts: 451 Forumite
    The key is probably the parenting, rather than the schools. Primary schools maybe, but so much is set by the time people get to secondary school.

    As the jesuit saying goes, give me a boy until he is seven, and I will give you the man.

    Agreed. Aspiration and motivation should start at home. Even far away from the likes of Benefit Street - among a great many of the families that I know personally - those that rely on benefits seem to see their parental role as teaching and encouraging their own children to work the benefit system, rather than saying to them, "don't be like us - you can do better".

    Maybe it's just human nature to follow a similar path to that of your parents, no matter who they are or what they do.

    I don't know ............ but it's very sad.
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    David Cameron, Nick Clegg and their friends all went to similar schools. The people on Benefits Street all went to similar schools.

    It is unrealistic to expect all of one group of people to succeed when they are set up to fail from the moment they are born.

    Very True.
    It doesn't help to have a Hereditary Head of State.
    Her Unelected Majesty The Queen stands as an example to us all - that however clever you are, and however hard you work, you won't get the top job unless you are born into it.
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • makeyourdaddyproud
    makeyourdaddyproud Posts: 1,294 Forumite
    edited 24 January 2014 at 1:40PM
    Glen_Clark wrote: »
    Very True.
    It doesn't help to have a Hereditary Head of State.
    Her Unelected Majesty The Queen stands as an example to us all - that however clever you are, and however hard you work, you won't get the top job unless you are born into it.

    That's how we have so many Sirs in top jobs. A badge of honour for lining their own pockets. If you are working class, you have everything to lose and nothing to gain.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.