We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Lunch Invitation from the Boss.
Comments
-
To clarify: I work in a large organisation with very firmly defined codes of conduct and I have seen colleagues drummed out for having completely blameless relations with staff of the opposite sex. Everyone's entitled to their opinion but if I were in the position of wanting to pick the brains of/poach/network with a junior female colleague, I would do it in my office, not over lunch. It's not impropriety, it's the appearance of impropriety that does the damage.
Anyone who does not see the dangers is naive in the extreme - we live in an age of finger-pointing and blame culture - but anyway, this is irrelevant as the OP is a man!
Gosh! I've worked in law firms for the whole of my career and not only did we have no such policy, but it was very very common for partners of one sex to take junior lawyers of the opposite sex for lunch one to one on a regular basis. We called it mentoring. Maybe I'm just an ugly old bird but this never resulted in any impropriety towards me
. 0 -
How did it go OP?
It was very good and a very nice meal.
Of course there was another angle rather than just a "catch up". Where I'm from originally my company is not well known within and the senior staff member was encouraging me to start branching out in these places and look for leads etc.0 -
arbroath_lass wrote: »Ummm that was a sarcastic retort to Alpha58's comment (which was claptrap).
Interesting range of responses. What I said was It's not impropriety, it's the appearance of impropriety that does the damage. Share that opinion or not - that's your choice but is there really a need to be so unpleasant?0 -
Interesting range of responses. What I said was It's not impropriety, it's the appearance of impropriety that does the damage. Share that opinion or not - that's your choice but is there really a need to be so unpleasant?
Oh come on. That was hardly unpleasant. What you are talking about is discrimination. Plain and simple. THAT is unpleasant.
Any organisation worried about the appearance of impropriety would have banned ALL one to one lunches between junior and senior staff. So I think your post was claptrap.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards