We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
After the Work Programme
Comments
-
some people still spending too much time on here when they should be jobseeking!!!
No more from next year
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-243274700 -
Johnnytwostep wrote: »some people still spending too much time on here when they should be jobseeking!!!
No more from next year
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24327470
Ever heard of multitasking? Comments only take a few seconds0 -
BBC News - George Osborne extends 'work for benefit' for joblessThose who had not found work after two years on the existing Work Programme - where contractors are paid a fee to get people into a job - will face a new scheme called help-to-work.
To still qualify for jobseeker's allowance they will have three options - work placements, such as cleaning up litter; daily visits to a job centre; or taking part in compulsory training, for example, to improve their literacy.
People would have to remain on help-to-work until they found employment - unlike the current scheme which is limited to six months.
Those who breach the rules will lose four weeks' worth of benefits. Anyone who breaks the rules a second time faces losing three months' worth of benefits.0 -
-
-
i see dennings theory of it only being one day a week has been proved wrong as expected.0
-
One can read attitude from text.
.We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
donnajunkie wrote: »i see dennings theory of it only being one day a week has been proved wrong as expected.
There was a woman on SKY a while ago who in unemployed and the Tory MP on the TV was telling her if she is applying for jobs and not getting s response she needs to speak to the JC as they will be able to give her guidance. Saying that they are the specialists in employment and it must be something the woman was doing wrong as she should be getting interviews. This woman was well spoken and well presented and she was furious with good reason. She said she has spoken to a number of people at the JC and they can not help her.
I mean anyone would think the JC can get you interviews when no one has any power to do so.
Also I think it was Adam Boulton who mentioned discrimination against the unemployed!We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
So when I write a cover letter and send me CV they see this do they? Must be extremely talented if they can! :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
thats an exaggeration but i think you get my point.0 -
donnajunkie wrote: »i think they are implying you put things like you must give me a job or else coz i am awesome and a rubbish company like you should think themselves lucky i am willing to work for them.
thats an exaggeration but i think you get my point.
If they don't reply I don't chase again and they do I thank them for the reply.We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards