We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Friend racially abused on the bus :(

1679111222

Comments

  • balletshoes
    balletshoes Posts: 16,610 Forumite
    dktreesea wrote: »

    One thing for sure. If I were of a mind to dress differently the normal way people dress here, not to mention wanting to be in a public place at the time or place drunks are likely to be on the prowl, I'd make sure I took some self defence courses first.

    maybe the OP's friend wasn't dressed differently to other normal people in the area, and she happened to be the only one in a headscarf on the bus at the time the drunk moron spied her?
  • dktreesea
    dktreesea Posts: 5,736 Forumite
    Every country in the world has people who are under pressure with some who drink heavily. That absolutely doesn't excuse racist outbursts at children, or anyone else, come to that.

    You are defending the morons dktreesea, by making excuses for them.

    What about goths, what about punks, what about bikers, what about hippies? What about - oh I don't know, any person in this country or any other who doesn't apparently conform to what a British moron drunk thinks is the "right" way to look?

    I'm not defending them. Nor excusing their behaviour. But why set yourself up for that kind of behaviour? And when children are involved, surely it's the parent's responsibility to make sure they get to and from their destination safely, including not letting them travel on buses that you know may be carrying undesirables who are likely to abuse them?

    When I first read the OP's post, my first thought was where on earth are their fathers? Why are they travelling on a bus alone at that age, without a responsible adult accompanying them?
  • balletshoes
    balletshoes Posts: 16,610 Forumite
    dktreesea wrote: »
    I'm not defending them. Nor excusing their behaviour. But why set yourself up for that kind of behaviour? And when children are involved, surely it's the parent's responsibility to make sure they get to and from their destination safely, including not letting them travel on buses that you know may be carrying undesirables who are likely to abuse them?

    When I first read the OP's post, my first thought was where on earth are their fathers? Why are they travelling on a bus alone at that age, without a responsible adult accompanying them?

    because they are 15? Mine is 12 and she gets to take the bus into town with her friends.

    This drunken moron episode on the bus could have happened in the afternoon - the pubs open at 11am and drunk moron might have been drinking at home since he woke up.
  • gettingbackontrack
    gettingbackontrack Posts: 241 Forumite
    edited 9 June 2013 at 7:18PM
    dktreesea wrote: »
    I'm not defending them. Nor excusing their behaviour. But why set yourself up for that kind of behaviour? And when children are involved, surely it's the parent's responsibility to make sure they get to and from their destination safely, including not letting them travel on buses that you know may be carrying undesirables who are likely to abuse them?

    When I first read the OP's post, my first thought was where on earth are their fathers? Why are they travelling on a bus alone at that age, without a responsible adult accompanying them?

    Again you're blaming the victims. "Why set yourself up?" "Buses that you know may carry undesirables"? You're clutching at straws to try to justify your disgusting views.

    I cannot imagine what kind of individual would think a 15-year-old girl should not travel safely on a bus. Good grief.
  • dktreesea
    dktreesea Posts: 5,736 Forumite
    Normal people? Good grief.

    I would say the OP's friend was more "normal" than someone who blames a victim. Or a drunken bigot.

    Shameful.

    Did I say "normal people"? No. Twisting my words. I think I said the normal way people dress. Quite a different thing.

    And I am pretty sure most drunks don't know what they are doing, including being able to fully control the garbage that sometimes spouts from their mouths.
  • OP You don't come from Bradford, do you? As I know Bradford has terrible trouble with racist men abusing women for what they wear and they are not drunk., maybe this is the same as what happened to your friend.

    At least in this instance he was drunk, which altho not good, is better than sober men doing it.
    McCannfiles : Read the archived Portuguese police files on the case- released 1 year after Maddie's departure.
  • dktreesea
    dktreesea Posts: 5,736 Forumite
    because they are 15? Mine is 12 and she gets to take the bus into town with her friends.

    This drunken moron episode on the bus could have happened in the afternoon - the pubs open at 11am and drunk moron might have been drinking at home since he woke up.

    Mine is 17 and none of them, neither she nor her friends, travel on the bus unless they have males accompanying them.
  • dktreesea wrote: »
    Did I say "normal people"? No. Twisting my words. I think I said the normal way people dress. Quite a different thing.

    And I am pretty sure most drunks don't know what they are doing, including being able to fully control the garbage that sometimes spouts from their mouths.

    You said "the normal way people dress here".

    What is normal? Where is here? Your idea of normal is definitely not mine from what I've read of your posts.

    And drunks don't know what they're doing so that makes it OK?

    You are trying to defend the indefensible and I wonder why. Every time you post I feel even more nauseated that people in this country might share your opinions.
  • gettingbackontrack
    gettingbackontrack Posts: 241 Forumite
    edited 9 June 2013 at 7:26PM
    dktreesea wrote: »
    Mine is 17 and none of them, neither she nor her friends, travel on the bus unless they have males accompanying them.

    I pity your children. You will blame them if they are attacked or abused.

    What sort of a world do you live in that you think a 17-year-old cannot go out without a male accompanying them? Utterly sexist as well as everything else.
  • dktreesea
    dktreesea Posts: 5,736 Forumite
    Again you're blaming the victims. "Why set yourself up?" "Buses that you know may carry undesirables"? You're clutching at straws to try to justify your disgusting views.

    I cannot imagine what kind of individual would think a 15-year-old girl should not travel safely on a bus. Good grief.

    What is so wrong with expecting people to be aware of the kind of society they live in, and to manage their lives appropriately if they don't want to be confronted with that kind of behaviour?

    You can't stop bigots, drunk or otherwise. They exist. All you can do, if you don't want the hassle or heartache of dealing with them is to try to limit the possibility of being targetted.

    And not all people would expect minors to have to take the risk of going on public transport alone to do anything.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.