Help needed

wouldbeqaulitymoneysaver

I will put the requested arguments forward because MSE is getting me seriously wrong, bar views which are stratospheric.
I have had this before and will no doubt have it again.
Ride out the storm baby.
Get MSE on side.
I have #SayNotoPCT MOJ Consultation Response to draft and get off promptly.

Valli

Valli wrote: »

I would find it VERY difficult to choose a lawyer who knows me 'inside out' because I don't have day-to-day dealings with members of the legal profession :rotfl:

I'd be more inclined to read this thread properly, and the links indicated, if it didn't look like a set of twitter feeds. No word limit on here; so clarity IS an option!

Paragraphs would be a start; at the moment it all seems rather hysterical.

wouldbeqaulitymoneysaver wrote: »

@valli I am probably hysterical due to the things that are at stake.
I am guilty of rambling.
I don't think Twitter Feeds are offensive. If MSE folks bother to read them they would learn a LOT. This is in the name of transparency as well as honesty. It is also a form of Self Validation and defence. As I feel the need to defend my position at this precarious point in time.

Then, if you are so serious about this you need to construct sensible, readable posts.

I didn't say they were offensive at all; but if I wanted to read twitter-type posts I wouldn't be on this forum where, as I say, there is no word limit.

So there is space for reasoned argument here. And sensible discussion.

robatwork

I actually feel out of breath after reading this thread.

digp

RFLOL

/10chars

wouldbeqaulitymoneysaver

I have disabilities and my communication is not what it should be, sorry if it gets peoples backs up.

I am sorry you are exhausted after reading this thread. I am get exhausted at the thought of MSE not believing me when I post the arguments for and against hopefully today. I do not look forward but I will press manfully on because I believe there is a case to be heard and I deserve MSE to hear it.

Takeaway_Addict

Quicker they cut the funding the better.....often wasted.

wouldbeqaulitymoneysaver

Evidence please? I do know of wastage that is the result of the so called answers to the problem ie G4S court staff.

gb12345

Spyros wrote: »

The other side of the story (not that the two posters on this thread seem to be giving their side of the story)

www[dot]dailymail[dot]co[dot]uk/news/article-2336003/15m-just-firm-legal-aid-gravy-train-Scale-taxpayers-revealed-Coalition-vows-save-200m.html

Lots of legal types with their snouts in the trough as another poster says.

Can't post links as I'm a newbie, but just replace [dot] with .

Proper link

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2336003/15m-just-firm-legal-aid-gravy-train-Scale-taxpayers-revealed-Coalition-vows-save-200m.html

There do appear to be a lot of solicitors and barristers getting very rich at the taxpayer's expense.

wouldbeqaulitymoneysaver

As predicted. I could also for the Against and in Opposing parties the need to force austerity on lawyers and law firms are not exempt.

wouldbeqaulitymoneysaver

I bet most of MSE will require Legal aid if mistakenly arrested.