We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Labours Living Wage Plan Will Boost Economy - Fairness And Equality
Comments
-
Dunno. I do. I once went out with that girl from The New Avengers you know.
New Avengers? Pfff! I'd take Honor Blackman any day of the week.:)...That is amazing. It shows how misrepresented the old girl was.
Yes, it's quite a surprising result.martinsurrey wrote: »...Looked at like that the numbers aren’t quite as rosy as you paint.
'Rosy' isn't quite the word I would used to describe the stats.
Granted you can have lots of arguments about lead times, and who is responsible for what. But then, as you admit, it doesn't change the fact that Thatcher built more LA/HA houses than Blair did.
And of course it doesn't take into account the fact that between 1980 and 1989 the UK population increased from 56.3m to 57.1m, or about 750,000, whilst between 1998 and 2007 the UK population increased from 58.5m to 61.0m or 1,500,000. So there were twice as many extra people to house in the Blair decade, but fewer extra houses were built to accomodate them. (So now you know why the price of housing shot up.:))martinsurrey wrote: »...and if you look at the number of right to buy sales, which she introduced, it was over a million by 1987 and 1.3m by 1990, so there were 900,000 LESS HA/council
houses after her than before.
I don't think that anyone is challenging that. But those houses didn't disappear. People carried on living in them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards