We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Immigration vital to the Nation's finances...

1234689

Comments

  • Sampong
    Sampong Posts: 870 Forumite
    Because the facts are that immigrants commit less crime than the native born, claim benefits at a lower rate than the native born, are a net economic benefit to society compared to the native born, and neither take jobs from, nor reduce the wages of, the native born on average.

    There are a plethora of reasoned arguments to refute everything you have just said that have been posted on this board which you conveniently ignore.
    But when you obsess about the evils of immigrants on every single thread about immigration, use misleading statistics instead of facts,

    The last three official references I posted were from Parliament. Two were regarding the rights of EU Immigrants to claim benefits and were non disputable facts - they were direct links to current legislation - yet you claim I use misleading statistics?

    If you want to see misleading facts - you need look no further than the tin pot report released as propaganda which you have posted in your original post in this thread and tried to pass off as factual.
    substitute anecdotal stories for evidence,

    Anecdotal evidence Hamish - get your facts right. And I don't substitute anecdotal evidence for statistics - I use the two sources in conjunction to gain an informed opinion. Statistics will often use incomplete data, estimates and assumptions so is often plain wrong. Anecdotal evidence is important and can prompt a closer look at inaccurate statistics.
    and then present absolutely preposterous claims such as it's commonplace for immigrants to be eating swans and pooping in the streets,

    First of all I didn't say it is commonplace. But I guess it depends what you define to be "commonplace". It's happening enough to be an issue - and it is not a preposterous claim.
    we have no choice but to assume you are in fact a racist.

    "we" being you and Mr Pricklepants - neither of whom's opinions are really taken seriously.
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    If as has been suggested on these threads that certain UK companies are advertising for workers in the EU only and that these aren't notified or made available to Job Centres in this scountry isn't that discrimination?
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • Sampong
    Sampong Posts: 870 Forumite
    edited 3 April 2013 at 10:08AM
    wotsthat wrote: »
    There's an argument that immigrants are vital to the future of the UK's finances.

    There is also an argument to suggest the contrary is true. Besides - the UK has benefited from migration for years. The problems I am pointing out are with open border - uncontrolled migration. Seriously - how many times?
    wotsthat wrote: »
    The link provided by Hamish is less than persuasive

    No kidding.
    wotsthat wrote: »
    and I'd suggest that the UK is being targeted by benefit tourists due to a) high benefits b) unrestricted access to the NHS and c) the gulf in living standards between the UK and some of our European partners.

    Those points are true.
    wotsthat wrote: »
    However, stories about 'dirty foreigners' really don't add to the debate - they're simply intended to be inflammatory.

    I wasn't the one to raise it on this thread - that was Mr Pricklepants. But you are wrong - they are not inflammatory comments - they are factual comments. FYI it's Hamish who leads the way with inflammatory comments in his attempt to strengthen his argument.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wotsthat wrote: »
    This is one area where the data is reasonably clear - immigrants are less likely to claim benefits.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16643677

    IMO it depends upon the country of origin. Polish people for example will be better educated than your average Slovak and they are more likely to return home because of the higher standards of living there. I can't see why anyone would want to return to Slovakia under any circumstances.

    Errr...

    Have you seen London? Page 9 of the report showing 48% of non uk nationals are claiming working age benefits against 13% of the native born?

    Depends how you look at the statistics and what you compare each statistic against.

    So, you could suggest that in 10 out of 11 areas of the country, immigrants claim less in benefits than the native born.

    However, you could also look at the numbers and that will show something quite different thanks to the massive amount (just shy of half of all immigrants!) of non nationals in London claiming benefits.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wotsthat wrote: »
    Assessments should be made before arrival. A basic English test and evidence of a completed education would be a start. That would already be significantly more than the current requirements.


    I start with the assumption that there are no jobs that UK residents can't do; including the BoE job.

    we need a specific quota system

    half the world can speak basic english and a certificate is pretty easy to obtain.
  • kevin52
    kevin52 Posts: 156 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Time to send them all back; lets start with anyone descended from the Angles or the Saxons. Only true celts here please.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kevin52 wrote: »
    Time to send them all back; lets start with anyone descended from the Angles or the Saxons. Only true celts here please.


    there were people here before the celts
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    there were people here before the celts

    Aye.

    The Picts, for one.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • dktreesea
    dktreesea Posts: 5,736 Forumite
    Errr...

    Have you seen London? Page 9 of the report showing 48% of non uk nationals are claiming working age benefits against 13% of the native born?

    Depends how you look at the statistics and what you compare each statistic against.

    So, you could suggest that in 10 out of 11 areas of the country, immigrants claim less in benefits than the native born.

    However, you could also look at the numbers and that will show something quite different thanks to the massive amount (just shy of half of all immigrants!) of non nationals in London claiming benefits.

    I would have thought anyone coming from the EU to live here and claim benefits would by now be here already, including the Romanians and Bulgarians.

    If they are self employed they have the right to reside, which gives them access to CTC and CB once their children also come over, or from the day they arrive if they have their children in tow. After a while they will pass the habitual residence test which will give them further access to public funds like housing benefit and council tax benefit.

    Yes, they may not currently be able to get jsa, but that hasn't stopped 80,000 Romanians coming here already.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    Depends how you look at the statistics and what you compare each statistic against.

    I was looking at the basic headline.....
    Almost 17% of all British nationals receive these benefits compared with almost 7% of all those classed as non-UK nationals when they first arrived in the UK.

    It's obvious really - the intention of most immigrants is to work.

    This stat doesn't mean that they are/ will be beneficial to the UK economy but it's important to get the basic facts right.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.