We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Labour Slip to 4th, Tories 3rd

1234568

Comments

  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 1 March 2013 at 11:04PM
    Generali wrote: »
    I just can't see that Tories would be dumb enough to vote UKIP to gain Labour in a General Election. It's a pretty easy sell to the public: do you want a mildly Euroskeptic Government or a heavily pro-EU one? You ain't gonna get a leave the EU Government.

    Surely all that happens as different parties gain support is that the middle ground moves. Many of the centrist policies in the UK would be considered to be very right wing in much of Europe and very left wing in the USA and Australia. The Centre is just the political median.

    On the face of it, if the Tories promised to do enough of the things UKIP promised they'd have romped home yesterday with 50+% of the vote. Clearly that's not going to happen when you have an unpopular Government. This is a protest; no more, no less.

    What it does do is strengthen the anti-EU part of the Tory party. It is often claimed that they're the Right but I have my doubts that they're synonymous. I usually think that the Right of the Tories are the old people and the small businessmen but perhaps that's just prejudice.

    Cameron is between a rock and a hard place. He can take UKIP out by adopting their policies which will make them unelectable outside of the Tory heartlands. This was about the 16th most winnable Tory seat remember. Or Cameron can move to the centre and lose his party to UKIP. The right is divided now like the left were 25 years ago.

    UKIP does not need to win a seat. If it takes 10% of the vote in Cameron's top 50 winable seats then Cameron can retire.

    The right of the Tory Party are what they have always been, those who are doing OK personally and who do not care about anyone but those in a similar position I know many small businesssmen who would not identify with that community and are quite pro-EU.

    If Lib Dems cannot hold a safe LibDem seat when the Tories are so divided Labour only needs to sit back and watch in this type of constituency.Their candidate might be called a celebrity but most people have not heard of him. OK CLegg did win this one but only just.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • morag1202
    morag1202 Posts: 536 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    Not really. It was held by Chris Huhne and is now held by Mike Thornton.

    The BBC website might say 'Lib Dem' hold but that isn't true. The individual has the seat not the party. If Mikey boy decides to join the BNP or Labour then the seat moves with him.

    If you're using that definition then the ruling party have won far more than 4 or 5 of the last 400 (485) by elections :D
    Murphy was an optimist!!!
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    BobQ wrote: »
    Cameron is between a rock and a hard place.

    Governments in difficult times never win favour with the electorate. 2 years is a long time in the current economic climate.

    If I was Cameron I would just get on with the job. Not worry about media spin.
  • A._Badger
    A._Badger Posts: 5,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    BobQ wrote: »
    The right of the Tory Party are what they have always been, those who are doing OK personally and who do not care about anyone but those in a similar position I know many small businesssmen who would not identify with that community and are quite pro-EU.

    .

    Still peddling the same old class warrior nonsense.

    According to today's research ( http://order-order.com/2013/03/01/voters-jump-from-main-three-to-ukip/ ) the breakdown of UKIP (Gasp! Shock! Horror! Vile, right wing baby-eaters!) from the other three packs of clowns was:

    Tory 22 per cent
    Lib Dems 19 per cent
    Labour 17 per cent

    Of course, what is really interesting is the cognitive dissonance that must have taken place in the "minds" of Lib Dumbs, who previously voted for a party best described as Europhiliac, then switching to a party that would like to see the EU put to the sword.

    Still, no one ever expected reason from a Lib Dem voter.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    She's Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury!

    I've seen some ducks out of water over the years. This one should be shot.

    I suspect she is one of those clever people who is far better suited to doing things in the background than leading from the front. She is an economist, but a very surprising choice for QT, maybe she was a late replacement!

    Actually she is Shadow Leader of the House, Rachel Reeves is the Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, a much more effective performer.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • Wookster
    Wookster Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    BobQ wrote: »
    Rachel Reeves is the Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, a much more effective performer.

    Yes if you ignore what she says... Its the same old spend spend spend song we've all heard before.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    BobQ wrote: »
    She is an economist,

    Another all theory and no practical work experience I suspect.

    Ah yes.

    "degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics "

    No wonder this country's derailed. As this current crop appear to have no clue how to cope with a fiscal situation that wasn't covered in their text books.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    A._Badger wrote: »
    Still peddling the same old class warrior nonsense.


    .

    Nothing to do with class. Anyone can be selfish, its a classless concept :)
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • A._Badger
    A._Badger Posts: 5,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    BobQ wrote: »
    Nothing to do with class. Anyone can be selfish, its a classless concept :)

    You mean like idiocy?
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BobQ wrote: »
    Cameron is between a rock and a hard place. He can take UKIP out by adopting their policies which will make them unelectable outside of the Tory heartlands. This was about the 16th most winnable Tory seat remember. Or Cameron can move to the centre and lose his party to UKIP. The right is divided now like the left were 25 years ago.

    UKIP does not need to win a seat. If it takes 10% of the vote in Cameron's top 50 winable seats then Cameron can retire.

    The right of the Tory Party are what they have always been, those who are doing OK personally and who do not care about anyone but those in a similar position I know many small businesssmen who would not identify with that community and are quite pro-EU.

    If Lib Dems cannot hold a safe LibDem seat when the Tories are so divided Labour only needs to sit back and watch in this type of constituency.Their candidate might be called a celebrity but most people have not heard of him. OK CLegg did win this one but only just.

    You are assuming that UKIP only take votes off the Tories. That's not correct as has been shown.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.