We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Moving is expensive, regarding bedroom tax
Comments
-
exarmydreamer wrote: »Ian Duncan Smith is currently living in a mansion, its free due to an inheritance fiddle by marriage. He also spends £30 plus of tax payer money on a breakfast, whilst young unemployed live on £50 a week.
but thats ok as according to most of the posters on here, he earns his money so deserves to have and do whatever he likes.0 -
exarmydreamer wrote: »Ian Duncan Smith is currently living in a mansion, its free due to an inheritance fiddle by marriage. He also spends £30 plus of tax payer money on a breakfast, whilst young unemployed live on £50 a week.
Tax avoidance should be closed, but currently it's legal (immoral but legal). He spent £39 on breakfast but wasn't the only person - just on his claim, and the value was within Govt subsistence that businesses use. JSA is £56 pw - whilst low it's not £50.0 -
princessdon wrote: »JSA is £56 pw - whilst low it's not £50.
But could be as low as around £42 if the average £14 of bedroom tax is deducted first.0 -
-
princessdon wrote: »Really? How many under 25 are in 2 beds with a rent of £100 pw?
Please don't ask awkward questions. I'm sure there are a few under 25s affected who will be forced in to severe hardship, one is too many.0 -
princessdon wrote: »Tax avoidance should be closed, but currently it's legal (immoral but legal). He spent £39 on breakfast but wasn't the only person - just on his claim, and the value was within Govt subsistence that businesses use. JSA is £56 pw - whilst low it's not £50.
So, it makes it ok for him and everyone else to spend that amount on a breakfast at tax payers expence?. Ok, I don't claim JSA, so they get £6.00 more than I said. Woopee do, that's almost a sausage or a bit of bacon, (comparing it to his breakfast). Come on, were 40% tax payers in our house but what I see going on is immoral but due to this government legal - does that make it better for you..Mortgage: Aug 12 £114,984.74 - Jun 14 £94000.00 = Total Payments £20984.74
Albert Einstein - “Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it ... he who doesn't ... pays it.”0 -
but thats ok as according to most of the posters on here, he earns his money so deserves to have and do whatever he likes.
Tax payers money, he actually married into money. He was a disaster in the Army and a disaster in Government. He was unemployed after the Army and married money. But, 'we are all in this together, so he should have had a piece of toast'.Mortgage: Aug 12 £114,984.74 - Jun 14 £94000.00 = Total Payments £20984.74
Albert Einstein - “Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it ... he who doesn't ... pays it.”0 -
everyone that works in the public sector is paid from piblic funds. does that mean tat they don't earn it?exarmydreamer wrote: »Tax payers money, he actually married into money. He was a disaster in the Army and a disaster in Government. He was unemployed after the Army and married money. But, 'we are all in this together, so he should have had a piece of toast'.
his job is as an MP, for which he receives a wage0 -
exarmydreamer wrote: »So, it makes it ok for him and everyone else to spend that amount on a breakfast at tax payers expence?. Ok, I don't claim JSA, so they get £6.00 more than I said. Woopee do, that's almost a sausage or a bit of bacon, (comparing it to his breakfast). Come on, were 40% tax payers in our house but what I see going on is immoral but due to this government legal - does that make it better for you..
I never said it was a lot of money - jsa is a benefit I think is underpaid. I guess it depends on your view. My OH had 5k of expenses in jan, many breakfasts costing more than the govt allowance, but I'd be horrified if anyone suggested he had miss breakfast because his hotel charged more. None govt worker before people complain.0 -
What government allowance? It's an employer allowance. Any amount can be claimed for breakfast. There are no government imposed limits but many employers restrict the amount that can be claimed to actual expenses incurred or £8 (or whatever amount they wish to set it at) whichever is lower.princessdon wrote: »I never said it was a lot of money - jsa is a benefit I think is underpaid. I guess it depends on your view. My OH had 5k of expenses in jan, many breakfasts costing more than the govt allowance, but I'd be horrified if anyone suggested he had miss breakfast because his hotel charged more. None govt worker before people complain.:footie:
Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards