We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Will The Bedroom Tax Affect Me?
Options
Comments
-
Again, this just doesn't make sense.
Those who have a spare bedroom and claim HB are to downgrade. Those who have a spare bedroom but pay full rent don't have to downgrade.
So if this is supposedly to help with the housing shortage, then why not treat all those with a spare bedroom the same?0 -
Those who have a spare bedroom and claim HB are to downgrade. Those who have a spare bedroom but pay full rent don't have to downgrade.
So if this is supposedly to help with the housing shortage, then why not treat all those with a spare bedroom the same?
Because its also about reducing unnecessary spending and the welfare bill.0 -
adouglasmhor wrote: »They don't affect owner occupiers anyway AFAIK.
I was referring to those on benefits in social housing, who don't like their HB reductions if they have more bedrooms than they need.
Owner occupiers wanting their mortgage paid by the welfare state, will be affected under UC I think. And no doubt with any new regulations they are talking about i.e. putting a charge on the property so that the welfare state can recoup the money and costs of loaning SMI (Support for Mortgage Interest) payments.RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.0 -
princessdon wrote: »Because its also about reducing unnecessary spending and the welfare bill.
But if that's the case, why are they prepared to pay higher HB rates if people move into the private sector.
It actually costs more to rent a one bed in the PS than a 2 bed in SH. Where is the saving?0 -
But if that's the case, why are they prepared to pay higher HB rates if people move into the private sector.
It actually costs more to rent a one bed in the PS than a 2 bed in SH. Where is the saving?
That's simple. Family x in PR costing £200 pw (2 bed) move to SH 2 bed. Single or shared room rate in private lets say costs £100 pw. It saves them £100 pw. Multiply by lots of claimants for larger return.0 -
But if that's the case, why are they prepared to pay higher HB rates if people move into the private sector.
It actually costs more to rent a one bed in the PS than a 2 bed in SH. Where is the saving?
That will be next. Give the conservatives some time to bring in reforms. A decade of Labour ineptitude has to be sorted.0 -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2280385/Jobless-mother-11-children-gets-council-build-SIX-BED-house-struggling-current-home.html
See above - now that will be a bedroom tax as her children move out (no doubt on benefits too)0 -
That will be next. Give the conservatives some time to bring in reforms. A decade of Labour ineptitude has to be sorted.
Labour pushed the rents up with their LHA as landlords put their rents up to the LHA rate when they came in.Now the rents will be pushed down again by government.
A lot of western EU countires have fixed rents and much better housing laws for tenants: such as a 3 year tenancy that only the tenant can break and landords made to take responsibilty if their tenants quality of home life suffers. Those good laws and the freedom and cheap living that renting gives, means that many in these EU countries, prefer to rent rather than be saddled with a big mortgage for years. These government fixed low rents are less burden to their welfare state too.RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.0 -
princessdon wrote: »That's simple. Family x in PR costing £200 pw (2 bed) move to SH 2 bed.
Which is very unlikely to happen, a family in private housing would usually have to be under immediate threat of homelessness to be considered high priority for social housing.
In fact, it is likely that the property is offered to a single tenant who is also under-occupying, particularly in areas where the demographic on the waiting list does not match two-bedroom properties. Hence, why a lot of tenants were offered properties which they under-occupy in the first place.
Under-occupancy is not generally a problem in areas where over-occupancy is high, and vice-versa.0 -
Or read this and feel good about yourself.
http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2013/02/13/five-stories-of-the-barbaric-reality-of-the-governments-bedroom-tax-for-disabled-people-i-lay-awake-at-night-and-go-through-all-the-things-i-pay-for-and-how-much-i-have-left-and-come-t/
or this facebook group ...
http://www.facebook.com/groups/antibedroomtax/
where members are actually considering suicide because they can't cope with all these cuts.
It's disgusting!!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards