📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Flight delay and cancellation compensation, Thomas Cook ONLY

1742743745747748858

Comments

  • diane456
    diane456 Posts: 51 Forumite
    Pinkyboy, according to their website, Condor are part of Thomas Cook group. You need to make your claim against the airline, not the tour operator.

    Try using this link https://www.condor.com/eu/help-contact/contact.jsp
  • Thanks very much for your replies. I will make my claim with condor airlines and fingers crossed I get somewhere! Does anyone know if I have any separate claim for the loss at the hotel also?
  • diane456
    diane456 Posts: 51 Forumite
    I don't know about that. I am only able to claim under EU 261/2004 which is a fixed amount. I would guess the same would apply to you. We lost 3 people's wages for 1 day and 2 people's wages for 2 days because of the delay but that cannot form part of a separate claim. I am of the understanding you can claim one or the other but not both.
  • Mark2spark
    Mark2spark Posts: 2,306 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    pinkyboy wrote: »
    Does anyone know if I have any separate claim for the loss at the hotel also?

    You do, but not under the EU261/2004 regulation (which is what this section of forum primarily focus's on).
    Your claim would be against the holiday company you booked with, for not supplying the goods as described under the contract.
    Note that if you paid with a credit card, the credit card company are jointly liable under section 75 of the consumer credit act.
    If negotiations fail with TCH on holiday loss recompense, then your legal angle would be the montreal convention, - this is much more complex for a layman to tackle legally (but not insurmountable).
    A voucher for approx 1.5/7th of the holiday cost should be your aim IMO
  • hi ..i have put a claim in with the CAA and with ABTA do you think this will make a diffrence or are they controled or backed by the airlines
  • hi ...i have made a claim against T/C i have also escalated my claim becuase of poor reply with CAA and ABTA will this help or are they controled or backed by the airlines
  • 111KAB
    111KAB Posts: 3,645 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ABTA will not be concerned. CAA are toothless, useless and worthless (rearrange in any order you wish) plus funded by the airline industry. Only way to deal with Thomas Cook etc is DIY court claim or use a NWNF.
  • diane456
    diane456 Posts: 51 Forumite
    I gave TC a 14 day NBA letter and it expires soon. I have had no response, not even an acknowledgement. I used Resolver and it is advising the next step is to escalate to the chairman. However, reading on here it seems it may just be pointless to do that and the best next step would be to issue a MCOL claim.
    I've also had no response to my email to TC regarding how badly I was treated as a special assistance customer (full details on page 372 of this thread). I am not wanting to go to the press over this as was suggested as an option for me, but I do feel incredibly angry and let down. Would I merge the two complaints or leave them as separate and just send the special assistance complaint to the chairman?
    Any advice welcomed please
  • 111KAB
    111KAB Posts: 3,645 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes separate - two different matters. Claim for compensation re delay should just be factual, over 3 hours delay so compensation due according to 261/2004.


    The other matter should, initially, be dealt with by correspondence to the CEO/chairman. Realistically other than an apology the only other offer they can make is vouchers/cheque so if you are not happy with that outcome the only other alternative is to name and shame.
  • diane456
    diane456 Posts: 51 Forumite
    111KAB wrote: »
    Yes separate - two different matters. Claim for compensation re delay should just be factual, over 3 hours delay so compensation due according to 261/2004.


    The other matter should, initially, be dealt with by correspondence to the CEO/chairman. Realistically other than an apology the only other offer they can make is vouchers/cheque so if you are not happy with that outcome the only other alternative is to name and shame.

    Thank you. I wasn't sure as I know that the special assistance issue is also a breach of 261/2004. I'll keep them separate.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.