We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Osborne Loses It - Our Triple A Rating And Its Future
Comments
-
I think the chalice that Thatcher inherited was not quite as bad as some make out,
Someone had to break the power of the Unions........
At the time I belonged to a Union (ASTMS). Around 50% of the Company's membership resigned overnight. Once it became apparent that the Union was dominated by politics not the interests of its members.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Someone had to break the power of the Unions........
At the time I belonged to a Union (ASTMS). Around 50% of the Company's membership resigned overnight. Once it became apparent that the Union was dominated by politics not the interests of its members.
I suppose she had to pave the way for a flood of immigrant workers to undermine the lot of the British workforce'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »It's hardly a fair comparison though is it. Both datasets compares a recessionary environment against a growth environment.
Obviously, debt is going to rise in a recession. Infact, it's what people are moaning about....that it's nor rising fast enough (taking on debt to provide growth).
heres another chart...from 1978 onwards...showing both Tory and Labour...theres hardly a year wheres theres no growth.
yet on here both parties are running a budget deficit for most of the period...0 -
You've got to be really quite worried about a AAA downgrading and the state of the UK debt - we might start losing the least ugly currency competition and pound weakness could lead to even more nasty in inflation - 2013 could be quite ugly.If you keep doing what you've always done - you will keep getting what you've always got.0
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »I'm struggling to recall what Labour have actually said of a constructive nature. Other than relying on a mirage of "growth". Though since the almost global slowdown. They've gone very quiet on this topic.
Remind me what is Labours plan to balance the books?
It could be that, like the Conservatives, they have not got a clue either how to kickstart the economy, or are they 'keeping their powder dry' to use as their trump card when the times comes.
Most of them are in theatre at the moment, which theatre we can only imagine.0 -
-
-
You've got to be really quite worried about a AAA downgrading and the state of the UK debt - we might start losing the least ugly currency competition and pound weakness could lead to even more nasty in inflation - 2013 could be quite ugly.
There's no control over imported product prices. So inflation of the bad kind will be around for some time.
Given there's no productivity growth in the UK (not GDP but output per head). Little sign of good inflation at the moment.
Often gets overlooked that there are 2 kinds.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Someone had to break the power of the Unions........
At the time I belonged to a Union (ASTMS). Around 50% of the Company's membership resigned overnight. Once it became apparent that the Union was dominated by politics not the interests of its members.
A trade union is its members not some abstract body they pay fees to. If 50% of your mebership did resign as you claim, why did they not just vote for one of their number to stand for the trade union committee? Then they could have influenced its policies to be the moderate beast most of you apparently wanted?Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0 -
A trade union is its members not some abstract body they pay fees to. If 50% of your mebership did resign as you claim, why did they not just vote for one of their number to stand for the trade union committee? Then they could have influenced its policies to be the moderate beast most of you apparently wanted?
There was far more extremism in those days within parts of the Unions. Far more leaning towards communists ideals. (Which of course totally came down with the fall of the Wall). Wasn't the New Labour politics of today. Striking (we lost pay) was the biggest bug bear.
The world has changed considerably since the early 70's. Suspect its just about to again. As feels like the end of an era.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards