We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Graham White Solicitors - Roxburghe UK Ltd acting on behalf of Excel Parking Services
Options
Comments
-
esmerobbo and Stroma. Points taken, but this particular thread has nothing new for some time and the disagreements and name calling have gone on for a bit long now.
Yes, we can all reply in frustration and negatively at times, but when it goes on and on just tit-for-tat, it really serves no purpose any more.
Judging by the quotes and responses, he came back last night and dished out yet more abuse. The posts have been deleted but some of them are still contained in quotes in others' posts.
Trust me, this poster is a weirdo, and knows how to offend and rub people up the wrong way. He's not after advice.Je Suis Cecil.0 -
Judging by the quotes and responses, he came back last night and dished out yet more abuse. The posts have been deleted but some of them are still contained in quotes in others' posts.
Trust me, this poster is a weirdo, and knows how to offend and rub people up the wrong way. He's not after advice.
Sorry, should have been clearer. I meant anything positive or added info, rather than a rehash of the old slanging match. I thought he did pretty well in going to court and winning and his summary post was informative, but there was no need to come back on and stir the pot, in my opinion.
Unless the official transcript is posted - and there seems no real need as I don't think anyone doubts that he did win, the thread has done its job.0 -
Forgive me if I disagree.
It was several pages of arrogant name calling by ScouseFantastic and little else. It served next to no purpose at all other than to rub the regulars on here up.
The responses from the regulars on here were tame by comparison.Je Suis Cecil.0 -
Forgive me if I disagree.
It was several pages of arrogant name calling by ScouseFantastic and little else. It served next to no purpose at all other than to rub the regulars on here up.
The responses from the regulars on here were tame by comparison.
You have made the point I was saying at 8.28 this morning. There is nothing constructive on this thread and hasn't been for a few days now.
The regulars shouldn't rise to the bait as some of the replies have been as bad as Scousers.0 -
I haven't seen any replies as bad as what ScouseTanfastic was posting on a regular basis but everyone has their own opinion.
And I am seriously tired of getting into nit picking contests with you, but you initially said 'nothing new has been posted' and now you're saying 'nothing constructive has been posted'.
Two different things, although I'm sure in your own mind you meant the same thing. Others may have interpreted it differently. You need to be careful like that, posting on an internet forum.Je Suis Cecil.0 -
I haven't seen any replies as bad as what ScouseTanfastic was posting on a regular basis but everyone has their own opinion.
And I am seriously tired of getting into nit picking contests with you, but you initially said 'nothing new has been posted' and now you're saying 'nothing constructive has been posted'.
Two different things, although I'm sure in your own mind you meant the same thing. Others may have interpreted it differently. You need to be careful like that, posting on an internet forum.
Regrettably, that's because you cherry picked as well as nit picked. You highlighted the first point of my sentence and then ignored the second half in blue, thereby missing the full meaning.
"but this particular thread has nothing new for some time and the disagreements and name calling have gone on for a bit long now."
I mean, commons sense would dictate that if literally nothing at all had been posted recently, then I wouldn't have made my original post at 8.28.
I can see that you are going to make a point of continuing to nit pick my posts and I am perfectly content to allow you to come over as small minded if you do.0 -
The bit in blue doesn't affect the meaning of your quote at all, nor does it convey that you acknowledge that posts were made last night.
I don't know why you're persisting with this.Je Suis Cecil.0 -
Reported. Bye bye.All aboard the Gus Bus !0
-
Reported alsoFor everthing else there's mastercard.
For clampers there's Barclaycard.0 -
I'm not going to quote you and you've already had an apology from me BUT your attitude stinks. The "regulars" ( as you call us ) don't have the power to ban you - the mods do. We've just reported you as an already banned person getting around your ban. Maybe if you'd been a little more mature and pleasant in your approach you might have not been banned. The mods decide what is right or wrong not us "regulars". And no, I'm no PPC spy.All aboard the Gus Bus !0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards