We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Sainsburys staff - should I complain?

135

Comments

  • smj43
    smj43 Posts: 385 Forumite
    Guardsman wrote: »
    Why take a member of staff off the tills to watch a self service machine.
    Would they not be better off having a extra 10 item or less lane.

    Not really. One colleague can oversee and serve up to 16 people at once on self checkouts. It obviously saves massively on labour costs by making the customers do it themselves.

    EDIT: What they said ^^
  • gregg1
    gregg1 Posts: 3,148 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    McKneff wrote: »
    Agree with this, they were there doing their job. What is 'glaring' anyway, what is the difference between glaring and looking.

    She was simply looking around for people who looked as they needed help. You looked as if you needed help, you maybe spoke to her sharply, not saying that you did but attitudes and perceptions work both ways.

    Do you think you were maybe a tad sensitive.

    I think if a customer is made to feel uncomfortable by a member of staff, then the problem rests with the member of staff NOT the customer.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    gregg1 wrote: »
    I think if a customer is made to feel uncomfortable by a member of staff, then the problem rests with the member of staff NOT the customer.

    I do hope you mean within reason. After all, if people wearing black trousers make me feel uncomfortable, is the problem on my end or theirs?

    However, i'm sure one letter of complaint wouldn't harm the staff member in question if it was down to the OP rather than the behaviour of the staff member. On the balance of probabilities, if it was the staff members behaviour......then there will be further complaints from other customers.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • smj43 wrote: »
    I have to disagree. That wouldn't be fair to the majority of people who have no intention of not paying for their shopping. Obviously we do have to watch everyone because there is no easy way to tell a shop lifter but there is no reason to make a point of doing it.

    Yes there is, because it puts potential shoplifters off. This is the same as the reason why there is often a security desk at the entrance. It's called overt security. If the shoplifters see the security they are less likely to steal.
  • Guardsman wrote: »
    Why take a member of staff off the tills to watch a self service machine.
    Would they not be better off having a extra 10 item or less lane.

    Not when one member of staff can watch about eight self service checkouts.
  • Actually at the store I work at (not Sainsburys) we are told to deter shoplifters through good customer service, not treating everyone like a potential thief! Being extra polite and attentive shows shoplifters they are being watched without offending genuine customers.

    You can be polite and still watch people. But being polite alone won't put shoplifters off. Letting them know they are being watched will.
  • smj43
    smj43 Posts: 385 Forumite
    Yes there is, because it puts potential shoplifters off. This is the same as the reason why there is often a security desk at the entrance. It's called overt security. If the shoplifters see the security they are less likely to steal.

    My store has no security guards, not one. Theft is minimal compared to sales and we don't watch people like hawks either. Security is a deterrent for some but seasoned shop lifters don't give a hoot how many cameras/security guards are in their face. So for the very small minority of thieves who will be put off by overt security, would it really be worth offending our genuine customers who may then shop somewhere else?
  • Zandoni
    Zandoni Posts: 3,465 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I'd complain about the service and I'd complain that there was only one normal till open, I hate self service.
  • gregg1 wrote: »
    I think if a customer is made to feel uncomfortable by a member of staff, then the problem rests with the member of staff NOT the customer.

    I work with the public and some take offence whatever you do!
  • Jamie_Carter
    Jamie_Carter Posts: 5,282 Forumite
    smj43 wrote: »
    My store has no security guards, not one. Theft is minimal compared to sales and we don't watch people like hawks either. Security is a deterrent for some but seasoned shop lifters don't give a hoot how many cameras/security guards are in their face. So for the very small minority of thieves who will be put off by overt security, would it really be worth offending our genuine customers who may then shop somewhere else?

    So you can't base security at all stores on the one where you work.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.