Does New Law (May 2012) Make Registered Keeper Liable to Parking Charges?

mikey72

Trebor16 wrote: »

It's quite interesting how, despite it being pointed out to you several times, that you continue to misrepresent the way things are done on the parking forum. Maybe you need someone to explain it to you, in words of one syllable, to give you a fighting chance? Or maybe you are much happier throwing lies around in an attempt to wind people up?

I'm sure you can find longer words if you try. I assume you fully endorse the post we're trying to skirt around as well? (Feel free to quote any lie I've made, and consider that a put up or shut up)

give_them_FA

You can take whatever you like. I can guarantee no-one other than you will give a dam. For the record, I have no idea at all what your question actually is.

mikey72

give_them_FA wrote: »

You can take whatever you like. I can guarantee no-one other than you will give a dam. For the record, I have no idea at all what your question actually is.

Fair enough. You claim not to promote anarchy in parking. https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2577323 post#5 . You can read it, it's clear. Do you agree, or disagree, with the use of the asda carpark by someone parking there to go to work, day in day out. It's simple. yes or no? No if's no but's no saying there must be other spaces, it won't be full, other shoppers aren't inconvenienced, etc. Do you approve of parking in Asda, regardless of any unknown factors, regardless of where it is, whether it's the last space or not, yes, or no? (Obviously Coupon Mad was a firm yes)

Trebor16

mikey72 wrote: »

I'm sure you can find longer words if you try. I assume you fully endorse the post we're trying to skirt around as well? (Feel free to quote any lie I've made, and consider that a put up or shut up)

Post 21 in this thread when you said this:-

"It's quite interesting, how you advocate parking anywhere, and insisting anarchy is fine"

I've done the put up, but I doubt you will shut up with your rubbish

Coupon-mad

Jay* wrote: »

I had posted a thread (Yesterday) about my dealings with Parking Eye. I was doing some research and I came across a recent piece of government legislation: Protection of Freedoms Bill, specifically Clause 56 and schedule 4.
From the website, "Stop Clause 56":
"Yes, Schedule 4 allows the parking operator to pursue the registered keeper of a vehicle for unpaid parking charges, whether or not the keeper was the driver at the time the charge was incurred.
In other words, they can hold the registered keeper responsible for a breach of the parking contract - a contract in which they, as a separate legal entity, played no part!
Schedule 4 also requires parking operators to meet certain conditions before they can pursue the registered keeper of the vehicle for any unpaid charges. BUT it places no burden of proof on the parking operator to demonstrate that these conditions have been met, nor does it provide a system of dispute resolution for vehicle keepers pursued for payment where these conditions are not met."
I'm hoping this doesn't apply here in Scotland. Sorry to be the bearer of possibly ill news......

Just quoting the OP, just to get this important thread back on topic.

:wall:

give_them_FA

You must have searched long and hard to find a two year old post like that. This is clearly a matter of obsession for you. What exactly is your connection with parking? Because it is becoming obvious there is more to your appearance on this board than you are pretending.

mikey72

give_them_FA wrote: »

You must have searched long and hard to find a two year old post like that. This is clearly a matter of obsession for you. What exactly is your connection with parking? Because it is becoming obvious there is more to your appearance on this board than you are pretending.

I didn't even look at the date. It's the seventh thread down at the moment. So, yes or no, now you have read it?

Coupon-mad

Could we get the thread back on topic please.

:wall:

mikey72

Trebor16 wrote: »

Post 21 in this thread when you said this:-

"It's quite interesting, how you advocate parking anywhere, and insisting anarchy is fine"

I've done the put up, but I doubt you will shut up with your rubbish

That's actually true if you read your own posts on here, so I have to be honest, (again) it really doesn't count.

mikey72

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Could we get the thread back on topic please.

:wall:

No problems. How do we improve the law, to make it actually work? Which was my original post on this thread, and is on topic.