Don't you just hate Royal Mail?

kazca

RFW - I would re-read your last post whilst looking in the mirror.

Interested to know where I was wrong and others put me right though - enlighten me

RFW

kazca wrote: »

RFW - I would re-read your last post whilst looking in the mirror.

Interested to know where I was wrong and others put me right though - enlighten me

I don't think anyone can enlighten you, that appears to be the problem.

kazca

RFW wrote: »

I don't think anyone can enlighten you, that appears to be the problem.

The only kind of answer possible but don't dwell on it too long lest your little world comes crumbling down around you:-)

RFW

kazca wrote: »

The only kind of answer possible but don't dwell on it too long lest your little world comes crumbling down around you:-)

I thought sarcasm wasn't allowed on your thread?

I'm not sure why you have to be quite so vitriolic when people have pointed out that you have appeared to be misinformed or lacking in knowledge. Rather than taking in the information and reacting to that you prefer to make personal attacks.

kazca

RFW wrote: »

I'm not sure why you have to be quite so vitriolic when people have pointed out that you have appeared to be misinformed or lacking in knowledge.

Where?

I have put many details on this thread than can be debated.
Where is the substance in your argument?
where is the substance in any of your posts on this thread?

What pertinent information have you, macfly or custardy added here?

StaffsSW

Typical Guardian reader. Twists, turns and avoids issues in order to fulfil their own sense of self-importance.

It's like the op is reading one thread, but replying in this one with the amount of wiggling and selective quoting going on.

Can't accepted their own error of leaving it too late to post, so makes a huge scene about how it's an outrageous travesty and everyone is against them.

kazca

stevew8975 wrote: »

Typical Guardian reader. Twists, turns and avoids issues in order to fulfil their own sense of self-importance.

Yes, agree entirely. Not so sure about the Guardian reader bit though, probably a mirror man.

the_lunatic_is_in_my_head

I posted above about Yodel and the cost of a cheaper service, your comments?

kazca

ludovico wrote: »

I posted above about Yodel and the cost of a cheaper service, your comments?

Where is the post Ludovico?

the_lunatic_is_in_my_head

Whilst there may be little to no competition if you compare to the courier market, companies like Amazon are squeezing companies like Yodel for lower prices (due to consumer behaviour) and the service seriously suffers with 'home delivery networks' creating a varying level of service due to staff being paid peanuts. There is always a cost to lower prices somewhere.