MSE News: MSE and Which? launch 'reclaim for free' PPI campaign

Borris-the-Bear

Moneyineptitude wrote: »

Of course, as I pointed out at post #42, it's a similar posting style and a similar message. I also wouldn't be surprised if the same troll were having a conversation with himself at post #45!
Obvious troll is obvious

I strongly suspect ppidisgrace, blindedbymediapropaganda and pickledeggs are all the same person. I'm quite amused by the idea of him staging these little conversations with himself while trying to add a degree of credibility to his claims. He could at least have put a little more effort in and created different writing styles for his 'characters'

They have all posted a great deal, but not one has clearly stated why a claims company can do anything that an individual cannot. There is no legal wrangling here. The complaint is submitted, evaluated and a final response is given. If the customer remains unhappy they refer the matter to the FOS. Statistically CMCs are no more likely to be successful than a lone complainant. In fact, if I was a lender I would be prejudiced against, and suspicious of, claims submitted by CMCs as so many are fraudulent.

davidh025c

BLINDEDBYMEDIAPROPOGANDA Would you like to read your above statements and then find an excuse for the statistics in the articles below?

http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regu...049803.article

http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regu...048810.article

dunstonh

Borris-the-Bear wrote: »

Did anyone view this video on the BBC website?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17792044

I have no idea why they selected this Financial Advisor, she makes a very simple process sound very confusing! The presenter's 'summary' then just compounds the confusion A terrible choice!

She is not a financial adviser. I just checked the FSA register and there is no-one with her surname on the FSA register.

You are right though. She makes a right pigs ear of explaining it. There is no requirement to get any agreements. If you have a complaint then you make it. You dont need to use the £1 CCA or £10 DSAR method. You dont even need to use the questionnaires (although it may help those that cant write letters very well)

BLINDEDBYMEDIAPROPAGANDA

Borris-the-Bear wrote: »

I strongly suspect ppidisgrace, blindedbymediapropaganda and pickledeggs are all the same person. I'm quite amused by the idea of him staging these little conversations with himself while trying to add a degree of credibility to his claims. He could at least have put a little more effort in and created different writing styles for his 'characters'

I have no idea who the other 2 are. In fact i think if you actually look close enough PPIDISGRACE seems to use broken English ! (Sorry PPIDISGRACE but its true) I also have no idea about pickledeggs but totally agree with his logic. Why dont you just stop insulting us and actually listen to what we are trying to tell you? I have nothing to gain by posting on this forum and as i have already said i will gladly help anyone on here for free !

Borris-the-Bear wrote: »

In fact, if I was a lender I would be prejudiced against, and suspicious of, claims submitted by CMCs as so many are fraudulent.

I suspect you have ties to lenders otherwise you would not be defending them. Lenders hate CMC`s because they do not like to have to answer to anyone but themselves> If we were not here who would make them listen?

BLINDEDBYMEDIAPROPAGANDA

davidh025c wrote: »

BLINDEDBYMEDIAPROPOGANDA Would you like to read your above statements and then find an excuse for the statistics in the articles below?

Totally agree that in any industry there will be sharks. Lets not forget all of the dodgy deals the banks have done but nobody gets into any trouble as they seem to be above the law ! Any dodgy CMC`s should be shut down as they really do give the rest of us a bad name.:mad:

Borris-the-Bear

BLINDEDBYMEDIAPROPAGANDA I am not defending lenders I am defending the right of ordinary people to keep 100% of THEIR money. Terms like ‘compensation’ and ‘winning’ muddy the waters here. People are not being compensated in the traditional sense they are actually being refunded their own money, albeit often with 8% interest. If I bought a jumper online that was advertised as being ‘navy blue’ and when it arrived it was actually bright pink. I could say this item had been falsely advertised and mis-sold to me. I would return this item and receive a refund of my money. I would not pay someone 30% of my refund to send the parcel on my behalf!

Borris-the-Bear

dunstonh wrote: »

She is not a financial adviser. I just checked the FSA register and there is no-one with her surname on the FSA register.

You are right though. She makes a right pigs ear of explaining it. There is no requirement to get any agreements. If you have a complaint then you make it. You dont need to use the £1 CCA or £10 DSAR method. You dont even need to use the questionnaires (although it may help those that cant write letters very well)

According to LinkedIn she is actually the MD of a debt advisory company.

BLINDEDBYMEDIAPROPAGANDA

Borris-the-Bear wrote: »

. I would return this item and receive a refund of my money. I would not pay someone 30% of my refund to send the parcel on my behalf!

I have already stated why we get involved for our clients and it really is their choice and by the rules we also explain that they could also make the claim themselves but still wish us to act for them> If folk want to do it themselves then thats great and i for one have no problem with and have already said i will gladly help for free> ot sure what you are still ranting about TBH?

Borris-the-Bear

BLINDEDBYMEDIAPROPAGANDA wrote: »

I have already stated why we get involved for our clients and it really is their choice and by the rules we also explain that they could also make the claim themselves but still wish us to act for them> If folk want to do it themselves then thats great and i for one have no problem with and have already said i will gladly help for free> ot sure what you are still ranting about TBH?

I am not 'ranting' I was merely responding to your accusation I have some kind of affiliation with a lender. I do not.

Bean31

"Banks are writing to millions of customers advising them that they may have been mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI), following the release of new guidelines by the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

The FSA estimates that between four million and 12 million letters will be sent out, but not everyone who has been mis-sold PPI will receive a letter as banks are only required to write to those who have been ‘systemically mis-sold’"

Anyone received one of these letters, doubt it!!!