How to get out of paying TV license (yes, REALLY)

will-in-estoril

diamonds wrote: »

Lets make that £15 a month on your electric bill before VAT and after income tax and most of the channels you cant listen or watch as the Port Broadcasting Authority says they are for international RTP channels ONLY ! but rest assured you will be paying for it on your electric bill, nice eh ?

Far too cryptic for me!

Kurtis_Blue

So do you have the unedited video that show the TV screen close up at 0.34 as it was turned on, pretty pointless video without it, why would you edit out the bit that shows you had done nothing wrong?

That TV had clearly been tuned in to view TV at some point, now obviously that could have been at another property so be nice to see the bit you edited out.

M.Shakey

Sorry mate. Still not sure which video you mean.

I dont understand when you say the video proves nothing ..... it got me aquitted :j

If you go to my Youtube channel you will see 2 video's.

Do you mean the 'TVL version'?

If you check with Jason he will show you the version without the 'image' on it.
It was taken by the Court for some reason.

You speak of an 'edit' I may be able to help there.
The first video, (shall we call it O = original), O was over a half hour long and could not be uploaded to youtube, (at that time, ie nearly 2 years ago).
I used a free video editor to chop the video up and then upload to Youtube. The cuts were automatic and I didnt chose the edit points.
The video was shot because, as you well know, BBC agents have a long and proven history of theft, assault, lying, purjury, perverting the course of justice, forgery (forging witness statements and signatures, I know you are trained to ask for sources and I have them), so the video was shot for my own protection with a view to proving facts in any upcoming litigation.

I was getting quite concerned as the statutory time limit for them to prosecute was running out, but at 5 months 2 weeks after the 'visit' I was duly summonsed.

You see I had devised this 'procedure' for legal avoidance of the TVL but it needed to be tested in some way.

Them taking me to Court was the perfect test.

Kurtis_Blue

How strange, you dont understand I will take it slow.

You uploaded a video to you tube.

You edited it at 0.34.

At this point the "Inspector" turned on the TV

Do you have the video where you did not edit the point the TV was turned on? obviously not the whole video, but the point the TV was turned on is clearly the ONLY important part.

Surely that's clear?

M.Shakey

How strange you still dont understand I will take it even slower... W H I C H ...... V I D E O ?

Kurtis_Blue

The one you uploaded to Youtube that you asked us to view?

Your yourtube channel only has two videos in it, its quite clear which one I mean. Crikey.

The_Safordian

Kurtis_Blue wrote: »

The one you uploaded to Youtube that you asked us to view?

Your yourtube channel only has two videos in it, its quite clear which one I mean. Crikey.

The fact he had to take your BBC pals to high court and won speaks volumes. The fact your BBC pals had to download someone elses youtube video and then somehow it was tampered with is also strange wouldn't you say.................oh forgot you aren't paid to be honest about the BBC

The_Safordian

M.Shakey wrote: »

Safordian

When I joined this site I actually read the terms and conditions .
I was not able to post URL's because of 'spamming', quite understandable no problems there.
I am not a 'spammer' and I wished to make a certain URL available to the general public in order to assist them in finding the correct reference to my comments.
You quite helpfully assisted me in this, but I notice that your post was removed.

Did you yourself remove this or was it censored ?

I will try again myself.

No sorry no luck, but if you wish to watch the video its on Youtube under the title 'TV Licence man fiddling about'.
There is also a short explanation in the video description box of how this video relates to this topic.

I cant see why you were censored, unless the LF supporters realised that, once again, they had lost the argument and wished to make it harder for people to find out the truth?
Perhaps they will notice this post when they start work later on today and click for it to be removed also ?

Like I said before they will never convince people to pay for the 'licence fee' by force of argument, only by force alone.

I alerted the mods to his BBC friend who kept trying to hi-jack the thread but it seems they took it upon themselves to remove posts related to it...................that or one of our BBC friends thought it a threat because it shows what their TV Licence friends do

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKsUkGEIBck

Anyway I've included it again. After all Kurtis is aloud to post just and nothing else

flexrider

Not entirely Read all the post but i presume that why the fees are so bleeding high anyway from people NOT paying their licensees others have to foot the bill?

gotta love good old blight e sometimes

as for the talk of you tube anyone can download a video off there? i dont get the your tube thing, how does the BBC know your account and password lol!! sorry had to ask

M.Shakey

There are no edits at 0.34 that I can see unless you have a different version.

Anyway what are you trying to prove here on this forum that a 4 day criminal Trial, with an additional 4 PCHM hearings + 2 plea hearings that could not be proved then.

Surely the key question is still how the prosecution presented a video which displayed an 'image', (by coincidence that came from a BBC program ????), that was not transmitted till 7 minutes after they had stated it was being recieved by my 'equipment'. This was stated by a key witness under oath.
This could NOT be the case.

The video that I pointed directly to was an 'edited' version yes, but the portion presented to the Court in a pathetic effort to convict me, is still intact in the 'TVL version'.

And to answer your question directly..... sadly.... no..... the 'original' 30 minute 'uncut' and the other 'copies' that were 'pulled' are no more..... they were wiped.
I just kept the 'Fiddling about' version to show what !!!!!! the BBC agents who 'visit' are like.