Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion

Quentin

Decado23 wrote: »

Who do you feel has been harmed by this?

If you need the deceit in the scheme spelling out for you, then don't lose too much sleep over it.

keggs

Quentin wrote: »

The deceit is all yours. As previously posted:

You advised your colleagues about your scheme whereby you choose where you park in a car park (between 2 cars). Then leave a hand written "thank you for not parking too close" note on the cars, complete with uw details when in fact it was you who parked next to the cars, not they next to you!

I fail to see the logic in the connection between deceipt and putting a thankyou note or any other card on someone's wing mirror.

Decado23

Quentin wrote: »

If you need the deceit in the scheme spelling out for you, then don't lose too much sleep over it.

That's not really an answer is it. Who was harmed by Keggs placing a card on a car's wing mirror (assuming the mirror was in no way damaged)?

How do you feel this harm compares to your unfounded accusations against myself and Nigewick?


UW Distributor

keggs

Quentin wrote: »

Which statements are dubious? (You know I can "prove" the situation about you not having a card over the last 12 months!)

Prove it then if it makes you happy to do so. Whether I have or have not got a cashback card actually has nothing to do with you has it? I haven't stated either way have I and nor do I intend to. That's my personal business. Or do you think that you have the right to know everything about my personal circumstances.

I don't think so Quentin.

keggs

Decado23 wrote: »

That's not really an answer is it. Who was harmed by Keggs placing a card on a car's wing mirror (assuming the mirror was in no way damaged)?

How do you feel this harm compares to your unfounded accusations against myself and Nigewick?


UW Distributor

And me as well. For that matter every customer, ID and potential ID

Cardew

1carminestocky wrote: »

It's a similar situation to you being happy with the service you get from BG and BT - even though the 2 companies are some of the most badly-performing on surveys/online polls/Which surveys etc (I believe BG came 2nd last in this latest survey with a 38% overall satisfaction rating even though websaver4 is purportedly one of the cheaper tariffs on the market). How can this be so? Because different people have different ideas regarding what constitutes value for money. I have just left Three on account of their appalling CS, even though, for me, they offer the cheapest deal. Does that make it the best value for money? Absolutely not.

So that is the reason for UW always getting top marks for Value in the Which survey on gas and electricy?

Really Carmine? You really believe that?

Even Which says that UW are 20% more expensive.

The survey has categories for best service etc

30,000 UW salesmen and their families all with a vested interest in seeing UW perform well.

An email sent urging UW salesmen and families to vote.

Participation in the survey is proportionately well above that you would expect.

Your excuses are getting more like Keggs every day.

You know your excuse is not feasible; I know the same, as does anyone with 2 brain cells.

Do you understand the meaning of integrity?

P.S.
French and Saunders to be quoted again?

1carminestocky

Your instant acceptance of a claim made by a disgruntled (failed?) ex-distributor with what appears to be litigation proceedings with the company and who has previously posted absolute rubbish tells me ALL I need to know about how you approach everything UW-related, Cardew. You're biased to the point of obsession. And you have an unhealthy obsession with me. Let it go. It's for the best.


PS Coming up tomorrow - what I will be paying UW for gas and electric used in the month of September compared to what I would be paying with BGs Price Protection April 2010...

Quentin

keggs wrote: »

I fail to see the logic in the connection between deceipt and putting a thankyou note or any other card on someone's wing mirror.

Probably you need the same message as your colleague.

If you can't see any deceit in writing a note to someone thanking them for their considerate parking next to you, (when in fact they were already parked when you arrived), just so that you have an excuse to leave your card on their car, then don't lose too much sleep over it.

Suppose its all part of the uw way of doing things - personified by the way you are all trained to take advantage of your friends by asking them to do you a favour and help you out over a problem at work, when really you want to just sign them up for "multiple services":

http://www.networkerplus.co.uk/videos/practice-appointment-shannon-griffin.html

AvengerSeawolf

Cardew wrote: »

An email sent urging UW salesmen and families to vote.

Not true. I never received one, have never heard of one, and we are still waiting proof that it exists so please don't play that card - you're on a sticky wicket. Of course, if dosumentary evidence does surface, I will concede but I am confident it has never happened.

JJ clearly has a personal beef. He sticks his head up every so often with some unproven, inflammatory nonsense without offering a shred of evidence and scuttles off again.

Cardew

keggs wrote: »

Not sure what you are trying to prove. How am I deceiving anyone. I simply show people something and it is up to them to decide to believe it. That isn't deception. Deception is deliberately doing something with the intent of extracting something out of someone that they don't want to give - usually money.

You are deceiving people by telling them that UW's internet phone does not use VOIP and it is "like a normal phone"

So you tell your customers, and post on here, that lie/untruth in order to sell your product.

Would you not agree that is 'deception'.

P.S.

Given that all the UW salesmen clamour to support each other on this thread; isn't it strange how none of them jump in to help you or carmine out when you post totally incorrect statements?