Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion

keggs

Quentin wrote: »

eg. Some UW reps come here to post they are happy with uw, yet on their own forums the same reps complain about uw, it's "atrocious" service, etc.

eg. Keggs has posted for a year now that he has been saving money with the risky uw card when in fact he hasn't got one!

If you think that Quentin then your are probably right.:rotfl:

Quentin

No denial then? Just what is the point you are trying to make by that post?

You have regularly posted over the last year about the savings you make thanks to the risky card, yet in truth you don't have one! And you do post as a different character on the uw reps forum where you criticise uw, and state your wish for them to stop selling energy until it's "more fruitful" etc. You are so negative that your colleagues urge you to stop as "the uw bashing forums" may use what you have to say!

And NigeWick has discussed the "atrocious" service he has had from uw cs with other uw reps.

1carminestocky

Anyone else think johnjames' level of hatred for UW is remarkably similar to Quentin's? I'm assuming if JJ is still a distributor he could still access the 'private' forum?

keggs

Quentin wrote: »

No denial then? Just what is the point you are trying to make by that post?

You have regularly posted over the last year about the savings you make thanks to the risky card, yet in truth you don't have one! And you do post as a different character on the uw reps forum where you criticise uw, and state your wish for them to stop selling energy until it's "more fruitful" etc. You are so negative that your colleagues urge you to stop as "the uw bashing forums" may use what you have to say!

Deny what? My business is my own and no one elses. I deny nothing nor do I agree.

Keep thinking what you like Quentin. Whatever it is will most likely be wrong.

Quentin

keggs wrote: »

Keep thinking what you like Quentin. Whatever it is will most likely be wrong.

It is downright deceitful to keep posting this to try and make out what I have posted is wrong.

You cannot deny this, simply because it is the truth, not my "thoughts":

Quentin wrote:

You have regularly posted over the last year about the savings you make thanks to the risky card, yet in truth you don't have one! And you do post as a different character on the uw reps forum where you criticise uw, and state your wish for them to stop selling energy until it's "more fruitful" etc. You are so negative that your colleagues urge you to stop as "the uw bashing forums" may use what you have to say!

janninew

1carminestocky wrote: »

Anyone else think johnjames' level of hatred for UW is remarkably similar to Quentin's? I'm assuming if JJ is still a distributor he could still access the 'private' forum?

I think that he needs to back up his claims with evidence. I also think that if UW didn't e-mail Reps asking them to take part in the Which survey, accusing the company of that could surely get you in trouble?

Decado23

janninew wrote: »

I think that he needs to back up his claims with evidence. I also think that if UW didn't e-mail Reps asking them to take part in the Which survey, accusing the company of that could surely get you in trouble?

Personally I've been registered as a distributor since november last year and I have received no prior notification of upcoming Which? surveys or requests to vote one way or the other (not that I could, as I'm not subscribed to which? anyway).

JJ is an admitted disgruntled ex-ID who posts for his own reasons. His posts have been generally malicious and incorrect in the past and I feel no need to give his opinion much consideration.

UW Distributor

Quentin

Janninew wrote:

Originally Posted by 1carminestocky
Anyone else think johnjames' level of hatred for UW is remarkably similar to Quentin's? I'm assuming if JJ is still a distributor he could still access the 'private' forum?

Janninew, he is a troll. I am not and never have been a distributor. I have posted that my motive is altruistic.

Which "claims" I have made regarding uw do you think require evidencing? Isn't keggs lack of a denial enough for you?

keggs

Quentin wrote: »

It is downright deceitful to keep posting this to try and make out what I have posted is wrong.

You cannot deny this, simply because it is the truth, not my "thoughts":

What you do post is generally wrong. Who is deceiving who Quentin. I don't discuss anything about my personal life or how I run my home, how much I pay etc on this or other forums unless I choose to. And no one will force me to do so.

However you have constantly deceived people here with your so called UW beating Cash Back card.

I think you should look at yourself first Quentin before casting aspertions on anyone else.

Keep thinking and posting whatever you like about me. It matter not one wit. I know the truth about me. And how I live my life and how I run my businesses.

1carminestocky

Plus it costs approx £100 a year to subscribe to Which? doesn't it? It would be a rather extreme way of furthering the UW cause, I would suggest...