Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion

keggs

Quentin wrote: »

Isn't keggs lack of a denial enough for you?

What have I denied exactly Quentin? Please gve me a clue as I must have missed something.

Cardew

keggs wrote: »

Whatever it is will most likely be wrong.

Would that be like UW's internet phone that appently doesn't use VOIP?

Why is it you can post such rubbish on here(Carmine would call it blatent lies) and not retract the statement when it is shown to be wrong.

I, of course, would not classify it as lies - you have just read some stupid claim about UW and that is good enough for you to repeat on this forum.

How many of your customers have you fed the same rubbish?

janninew

Quentin wrote: »

Janninew, he is a troll. I am not and never have been a distributor. I have posted that my motive is altruistic.

Which "claims" I have made regarding uw do you think require evidencing? Isn't keggs lack of a denial enough for you?

Sorry I wasn't referring to you, more to the claims made by johnjames1.

Quentin

keggs wrote: »

What you do post is generally wrong. Who is deceiving who Quentin.

Were I to post wrongly, you would take delight in demanding retraction!

We remember how uptight you got when I reported your deceitful car parking plan.

You went into "liar liar" mode, not because your deceit was a lie, but because I had assumed you stuck your cards under the cars windscreen wipers when in fact you put them on the cars mirrors!

keggs

Quentin wrote: »

Were I to post wrongly, you would take delight in demanding retraction!

We remember how uptight you got when I reported your deceitful car parking plan.

You went into "liar liar" mode, not because your deceit was a lie, but because I had assumed you stuck your cards under the cars windscreen wipers when in fact you put them on the cars mirrors!

And your point is?

Quentin

keggs wrote: »

What have I denied exactly Quentin? Please gve me a clue as I must have missed something.

More misrepresentation.

Where have I accused you of denying anything?

keggs

I also fail to understand the logical connection between deceit and putting a card on someone's car wing mirror.

1carminestocky

Quentin wrote: »

Janninew, he is a troll. I am not and never have been a distributor. I have posted that my motive is altruistic.

Which "claims" I have made regarding uw do you think require evidencing? Isn't keggs lack of a denial enough for you?

Loads to choose from but I think the one everyone is waiting for is the UW-beating cashback card details/evidence?

keggs

OK I agree. please explain 'lack of denial'?

Cardew

vinnyph wrote: »

Distributors usually are just speaking to friends they know or to people their customers know and have no involvement with any FSA regulated business and are not using a database of mortgage clients. In either case because the distributor knows them then it is OK to keep their details and no need to be a person registered under Data Protection. Otherwise I would never be able to retain my friends contact details and contact them.

Why not just contact other people who are not on that FSA regulated database.

Well some UW IDs on this thread deny they sell to family and friends!

What about the contacts Keggs makes by leaving his card on cars?