We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PPI FAQs discussion thread

18384868889109

Comments

  • The Funding Corporation (ACF Car Finance) has been in contact about mis-selling of PPI and said that I would have an answer of the outcome within 8 weeks, this time has now passed by 5 days. What is my next course of redress go straight to the Ombudsman or contact the company again stating about their failure to respond within the8 week time limit?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,181 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    bbqlw08 wrote: »
    The Funding Corporation (ACF Car Finance) has been in contact about mis-selling of PPI and said that I would have an answer of the outcome within 8 weeks, this time has now passed by 5 days. What is my next course of redress go straight to the Ombudsman or contact the company again stating about their failure to respond within the8 week time limit?

    The 8 week guideline is not a mandatory to comply with it. It is an objective timescale. After 8 weeks, you are free to refer your complaint to the FOS. However, you cannot complain again about them not meeting 8 weeks.

    Your choice is now to give them a bit longer or join the FOS queue which could be another 18 months.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Mamon_2
    Mamon_2 Posts: 5 Forumite
    edited 7 December 2014 at 11:14AM
    When I took out my mortgage I was told that that banks house and contents insurance was compulsory for that mortgage. It was very expensive and I would not have used that product otherwise. I have been told since that they were not allowed to make insurances compulsory. I assume I have therefore been missold, but can I reclaim as it was not Payment insurance but another compulsory insurance product.
  • Mamon wrote: »
    When I took out my mortgage I was told that that banks house and contents insurance was compulsory for that mortgage.
    This was correct. You have no complaint.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,045 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Mamon wrote: »
    When I took out my mortgage I was told that that banks house and contents insurance was compulsory for that mortgage. It was very expensive and I would not have used that product otherwise. I have been told since that they were not allowed to make insurances compulsory. I assume I have therefore been missold, but can I reclaim as it was not Payment insurance but another compulsory insurance product.

    It is a requirement, even today, to have buildings insurance when getting a mortgage - if there was a fire say and the house burned down, how would you pay off the mortgage + rebuild the house? You would not ever get a mortgage without that.

    There was no requirement back then to tell you that insurance was cheaper elsewhere.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,181 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    When I took out my mortgage I was told that that banks house and contents insurance was compulsory for that mortgage.

    It used to be until the late 90s. It is still mandatory to have buildings insurance but the bank cannot enforce its product any more. However, they used to be able to.
    . I have been told since that they were not allowed to make insurances compulsory.

    Rules change but what matters is the rules that were in place at the time. Not now.
    I assume I have therefore been missold, but can I reclaim as it was not Payment insurance but another compulsory insurance product.

    Nothing you have said indicates mis-sale unless you purchased relatively recently. Home insurance is mandatory, so a complaint on that basis is not going to work. you would have to show the bank forced theirs in an era when they were not allowed to do that.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • I took out a loan (through LoanLine) with First National Bank plc in 2001 which also had PPI premium paid in full at the time of the loan. I had to accept this, although I didn't need it, to get the loan. I have written to the address on the 2001 correspondence but have not heard back from First National Bank plc. The loan was paid off some years ago, but I want to try and reclaim the PPI premium. Can someone advise me please what I should do next. Thank you.
  • roonaldo
    roonaldo Posts: 3,420 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ForumLindi wrote: »
    I took out a loan (through LoanLine) with First National Bank plc in 2001 which also had PPI premium paid in full at the time of the loan. I had to accept this, although I didn't need it, to get the loan. I have written to the address on the 2001 correspondence but have not heard back from First National Bank plc. The loan was paid off some years ago, but I want to try and reclaim the PPI premium. Can someone advise me please what I should do next. Thank you.
    Loan Line sold you the PPI so you need to contact them. First National (now GE Money) are the lender.
  • i claimed ppi with a third party and they said they cannot reclaim on the same account as before, barclays paid the money and now they want a Percentage back?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,181 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    novice2dis wrote: »
    i claimed ppi with a third party and they said they cannot reclaim on the same account as before, barclays paid the money and now they want a Percentage back?

    Claims companies do not get the money. You get the redress payment and need to pay the claims company their bill.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.