Euro Car Parks : "County Court judgement SUBMITTED" sent by registered post

taffy056

If you do send a LBA, also include the landowner/agent in that action if it's different from the retailer, I think they could be liable as well . You know the person driving, they are not considered disabled under the equalities act are they ? Anything like diabetes or arthritis or if they are long term ill could be considered disabled. Be another thing to add.

Sirdan

give_them_FA wrote: »

They cannot take ANY of the cases to court without being able to prove, in every individual case, who was the driver of the car.

Yes I'd like to see their evidence that the keeper was the driver on each and every of the 31 occasions ..which is what they need to do if they want to run this as one single claim against one named individual ! What a bunch of plonkers.

Even IF they could prove 16 out of 31 does it follow that the other 15 are the same person ,could all the other 15 not just as easily be the keepers partner ?????

I think these guys need to get some of that proper legal advice that the PPCs seem keen to advise harassed keepers to get !!!

Of course if the OP has posted accurately and they have issued their invoices to the "Registered Keeper" in their own words then they have shot themselves in both feet as we all know the RK has no liability and to suggest otherwise is nothing but blatant fraud.

AlexisV

Ignore everything apart from a letter from the court.

They're entitled to tell you they have submitted a court claim. It would be potentially fraudulent to state they have submitted a 'county court judgement' (unless they made a claim, got no response and applied for a default judgement).

Option 2 would be to draft a letter before action and send a copy to Sainbury's and Euro.

memphis73

Thanks everyone for your invaluable advice.

I'm posting the letter here, and at pepipoo as well. I'll consider my response carefully, and would welcome all input.

But as a new user I'm unable to post a link, can I DM someone ?

peter_the_piper

Host on tinypic, take the url for message boards and copy it onto a post but remove the http bit. Good browsers put it in anyway.

give_them_FA

Start by making a full list of everything they have done to date. This will need to be recapitulated on the letter before action. More for Sainsbury's benefit than ECP's. They aleady know, lol.

memphis73

Thanks !

**paperwork removed following advice from forum member**

maninthestreet

memphis73 wrote: »

Thanks !

Please add http:// to the following

i1050.photobucket.com/albums/s410/memphis7373/ScreenShot2012-02-20at114350.png

'Persistent Offender'!!!

peter_the_piper

I would have thought that letter a bit dodgy, pretending to say they have had a court judgement when its pretty certain they have been nowhere near one. Did they provide the schedule that was supposed to have been attached? If so, please post as well.

Coupon-mad

Here's the clicky link:

http://i1050.photobucket.com/albums/s410/memphis7373/ScreenShot2012-02-20at114350.png

I guess they mean they reckon they have submitted a Court CLAIM rather than Judgment, as they have mentioned a Court fee so that is how I read it? They cannot even get that right! Wonder what the particulars of claim have been stated as on the claim, if there is one?!