Are PPC's suppressing threads when they lose in court?

TrickyWicky

Of course with all of their stitched up phone in competitions and other tactics, the BBC are well known for their truth and honesty aren't they.

I'm not defending perky but you have to admit, there is no proof that he said it, just the BBCs word. Exagerating stuff does no-one any good and I think this thread is turning into chineese whispers.

ripped_off_driver

Perky was one offered a challenge by Pepipoo to put his money where his very large mouth is and take a case against a clued up member of that site.

What happened? Perky choked. Surprise, surprise. It was one ridiculous excuse after another as to why he could not accept the challenge.

It's easy to be a Perky Mason when you are up against little old grannies with no knowledge of the law. Even then the bozo has lost cases, as we know.

Maybe one day Perky will discover some cojones and take up the Pepipoo challenge. Round about the same time as the Danish pot bellied is coming in to land methinks.

taffy056

All the advice in the watchdog videos are still current, there is more than one, there is in fact a further two from last year. And there is a thread with them all in, going to bump that up now for all to see.

And even with new laws coming in , I think this is going to be the biggest red herring for the scammers since the last red herring , yes people may be forced to give drivers details, but still the scammers need to take it to the small claims to get anything

timwilson

I still fail to see (and so does the court) how any person could expect to avoid payment when the signage they are parked clearly in front of states:

CLEARLY DISPLAYED VALID CPS PERMITS ONLY
All vehicles must be parked in their allocated bay (if applicable) and in a non obstructive manner.

The landowner and its agents hereby permit all valid CPS permit holders (who are parked in their allocated bays where applicable) permission to park on this land in accordance with the terms of their permit. The landowner and its agents also offers all members of the public who have not obtaines or have not displayed the valid permit in advance the right to park on this land in returne for a payment of £85 per set 24hr period.
One charge per 24hr period can be made, the charge will increase to £135 + collection/court costs resulting in further action being taken against you if the charge remains unpaid after 28days.


I have heard every story in the book, we offer the right to park to anyone who does not have a permit for a set charge.

They can take it or leave it - thats the price we charge, if people do not want to accept our offer then they do not park.

The courts accept it, despite the usual defences (unfair contracts, unreasonable cost etc..) - the charge to park is clearly offered to them as a non permit holder

Coupon-mad

TrickyWicky wrote: »

Of course with all of their stitched up phone in competitions and other tactics, the BBC are well known for their truth and honesty aren't they.

I'm not defending perky but you have to admit, there is no proof that he said it, just the BBCs word. Exagerating stuff does no-one any good and I think this thread is turning into chineese whispers.

What? That's Perky's picture all right! That link has been posted lots of times whenever Perky trolls here and he admits it's what he did & doesn't seem to have the moral compass the rest of us have, doesn't get that behaviour like that isn't the norm.

How he ever thinks any kid he spawned could possibly have the brains for Grammar School is beyond me though. IMHO she would have crashed hopelessly if Perky/Daddy had blagged her way into the school - it would have been setting your child up for a fall if she wasn't up to it Perky. I hear that Laura doesn't even have a proper job now - is she just a horsey type like the Renshaw-Smith girls (who do at least have good brains as well).

ripped_off_driver

Dress it up how you like Perky. A penalty is still a penalty even if disguised as a "charge".

Take the Pepipoo challenge and be a man. Are you up for it?

timwilson

ripped_off_driver wrote: »

Perky was one offered a challenge by Pepipoo to put his money where his very large mouth is and take a case against a clued up member of that site.

What happened? Perky choked. Surprise, surprise. It was one ridiculous excuse after another as to why he could not accept the challenge.

It's easy to be a Perky Mason when you are up against little old grannies with no knowledge of the law. Even then the bozo has lost cases, as we know.

Maybe one day Perky will discover some cojones and take up the Pepipoo challenge. Round about the same time as the Danish pot bellied is coming in to land methinks.

We all know that didnt happen, why have a setup case when we all know thats illegal and not what the courts are there for. You lot are obsessed with setup cases .. why ??? there are plenty of real ones out there.

Our friend Alexis is one of the so called 'clued up' people and he assisted with 2 defences for the same defendant recently (he was even naughty and waited until he received our bundle on day 14 before the hearing before sending his in)

This was a great chance for him as a so called 'expert' to put it to the test and he did but the court saw through it.

He could have even attended the court himself with the person, the hearing was in Stoke and Alexis is only in Manchester so less than 1hr travel but he bottled it.

SO dont keep going on about the pepipoo challenge (remember that the moderator "Southpaw" on pepipoo tried to get clever once after he had a ticket from ourselves and tried to get out of it by telling some porkies and ended up getting suspended from his job at west mercia police and during a full disciplinary investigation he resigned without wishing the hearing to complete and clear his name, read into that as you wish ... so dont over estimate peipoo or the so called experts)

TrickyWicky

Well I don't doubt it is his picture, all I'm saying is you can't always rely on the medias version of what someone said. Sometimes you need to stand back and look at the possibilities for information to be altered and then realise that just because someone 'says' doesn't mean that its actually factual.

I'm not going to go about researching him or anything like that, I have better things to do with my time. Insulting someones child however is pathetic Coupon and I thought more of you than that. It's not his daughters fault that her father is who he is, you can't blame her for choosing her parents of choosing to be born, give the kid a break. Whilst Mr Perkins undoubtedly has brought it on himself in some ways, his daughter has not. Leave her out of this.

Coupon-mad

TrickyWicky wrote: »

Well I don't doubt it is his picture, all I'm saying is you can't always rely on the medias version of what someone said. Sometimes you need to stand back and look at the possibilities for information to be altered and then realise that just because someone 'says' doesn't mean that its actually factual.

I'm not going to go about researching him or anything like that, I have better things to do with my time. Insulting someones child however is pathetic Coupon and I thought more of you than that. It's not his daughters fault that her father is who he is, you can't blame her for choosing her parents of choosing to be born, give the kid a break. Whilst Mr Perkins undoubtedly has brought it on himself in some ways, his daughter has not. Leave her out of this.

He brought her into the public domain, his problem. She's an adult now anyway.

timwilson

Coupon-mad wrote: »

What? That's Perky's picture all right! That link has been posted lots of times whenever Perky trolls here and he admits it's what he did & doesn't seem to have the moral compass the rest of us have, doesn't get that behaviour like that isn't the norm.

How he ever thinks any kid he spawned could possibly have the brains for Grammar School is beyond me though. IMHO she would have crashed hopelessly if Perky/Daddy had blagged her way into the school - it would have been setting your child up for a fall if she wasn't up to it Perky. I hear that Laura doesn't even have a proper job now - is she just a horsey type like the Renshaw-Smith girls (who do at least have good brains as well).

Earlier I thought we were friends when you thanked me, now you are being a nasty individual by mentioning peoples children - thats desperation for you.

Dont over flatter yourself, you know nothing, but for the record .. of course Laura does not have a proper job, shes still in full time education as most kids are at 17.

If you have a problem with me then keep it with me, I know that you have nothing of any worth to say but bringing peoples children into your vile abuse, thats low.