Are PPC's suppressing threads when they lose in court?

ripped_off_driver

Ha ha, yes I am often in the habit of handing over my details to a slightly deranged, obsessional, stalker-profile individual with some huge chips on his shoulder.

How many forum IDs are you on now Perky, must be hundreds?

ripped_off_driver

Just joshing with you Perky. You shouldn't take it so seriously. For someone who came on here yesterday lying about being the defendant in a case involving your own company, in an attempt to get one over on everyone who advises people receiving unenforcable PPC invoices, you aren't half sensitive when someone gets at you.

TrickyWicky

Lol, just clocked in for the first time today... wow, what a laugh you chaps have given me.

GlennTheBaker

This is better than a soap opera.

TrickyWicky

Now its gone quiet!

Hadeon

timwilson wrote: »

If you have a problem with me then keep it with me, I know that you have nothing of any worth to say but bringing peoples children into your vile abuse, thats low.

timwilson wrote: »

Again, a word of advice - keep your issues to me.

I actually agree with that, but I do so despise your own methods, hypocrisy & double-standards.

If you have a 'problem' and/or 'issues' (real, perceived, or imagined) with the drivers of motor vehicles parking on private land that you (and your ilk) manage (sic), then keep them with the drivers and cease deceiving/harassing/intimidating/threatening registered keepers (and often totally innocent members of their families) who may well not be the drivers & against whom you have absolutely no evidence.

Bringing innocent people into your vile business model is most certainly 'low'.
　
If you are prepared to 'play dirty', then don't be surprised & whinge when/if someone reciprocates.

scabbyfiver

timwilson wrote: »

Actually, lets go one further.

Who are you, publish up a photo of yourself so we can see if you are part of the beautiful party and I can also try and work out why you seem to such an issue with weight issues.

Come on sport, you seem to know lots about me - just a glimpse into your world .. thats all I am after.

How many thinly veiled threats are you going to make? I've counted several on this thread that smacks of that.

You're doing nothing to enhance your reputation or that of your companies.

In fact you're sounding like a bit of a desperado...trying to intimidate people over the internet.

People will believe Martin Lewis over people like you...so why bother?

scabbyfiver

GlennTheBaker wrote: »

This is better than a soap opera.

All it's done is confirm that some of these companies are run by Spivs.

Nobody should be frightened...nothing changes...ignore them and they go away.

robredz

Anyway As I am sure that CPS like to be squeaky clean, would a representative like to reply to the forum regarding the £7,000 fine the EU can issue for the non compliance of their website, I shall wait to hear if they reply to my email :

US CAN-SPAM Act 2003 - No issues found. EU Privacy Regulations 2003 - Some pages violate these regulations. Copyright Law - No issues found. PriorityURL / DescriptionGuideline Line This page has no privacy policy. If your web server logs visits, then every page reachable by a search engine should have a privacy policy explaining what is logged and how the logs are used.EU Privacy Regulations

http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/ 1
http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/about.html 1
http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/process.html 1
http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/solutions.html

Before they resort to the law, they should comply with it themselves :mad::mad::mad:

Come on Perky answer, pray do tell why your website is illegal. Just to inform you I have sent a complaint about your site to the Data Commissioner,

taffy056

Hadeon wrote: »

I actually agree with that, but I do so despise your own methods, hypocrisy & double-standards.

If you have a 'problem' and/or 'issues' (real, perceived, or imagined) with the drivers of motor vehicles parking on private land that you (and your ilk) manage (sic), then keep them with the drivers and cease deceiving/harassing/intimidating/threatening registered keepers (and often totally innocent members of their families) who may well not be the drivers & against whom you have absolutely no evidence.

Bringing innocent people into your vile business model is most certainly 'low'.
　
If you are prepared to 'play dirty', then don't be surprised & whinge when/if someone reciprocates.

The thing is two wrongs don't make a right, people are lowering themselves to his level by abusing his family on here. I don't like his tactics or his company and industry , but keep it to him only IMO his family has got nothing to do with us and we are devaluing the message by doing so.