People not knowing how to use motorways properly.

Hadrian

OneYorkshireLass wrote: »

Why is it that middle lane hoggers are usually either of the following: women who are sat so far forward in their seat that their head is practically touching the steering wheel, or men with their right elbows resting on the window sill?

When we had number plates that could determine where the car/driver came from I was always 'amused' by the number of scotch drivers ("S" as second or third letter) driving along in the middle lane of the A1 going north.
Women drivers who sit too far forward? That's amused me for years, bent arms nearly into a right angle. Can't be relaxing can it? My Ma used to drive like that, so far forward I could see the back of her head from the front passenger seat! One last shot, those who turn to talk to, and face their passenger whilst driving. :A

unholyangel

Hadrian wrote: »

When we had number plates that could determine where the car/driver came from I was always 'amused' by the number of scotch drivers ("S" as second or third letter) driving along in the middle lane of the A1 going north.

They were driving while drinking whiskey? :eek:

Honeydog

stephen77 wrote: »

So you cleary have not got a reason that you want to admit to.
Just answer why you have been flashed. If you tell me why I will be not able to jump to any conclusions.
At the moment I have jumped to a conclusion and unless you tell me otherwise I will and others on here will still think at times your sit and hog the middle lane.

Why would I want to enter into a further conversation with someone who jumps to conclusions and makes things up? It would be pointless and frustrating. I would end up regretting it. So you carry on without me.

Just in case you missed it the first time I said it. :rotfl:

stephen77

Honeydog wrote: »

Why would I want to enter into a further conversation with someone who jumps to conclusions and makes things up? It would be pointless and frustrating. I would end up regretting it. So you carry on without me.

Just in case you missed it the first time I said it. :rotfl:

Read it the first time. Also read you said "end of conversation" as well but carried on responding.

Their will be a few people on here now assume you have been driving in the middle lane and slow down if your challenged about it.

Forums are full of people jumping to conclusions unless you write down more information which you are failing to do. Thus we have to assume until we get corrected with the full story.

Honeydog

stephen77 wrote: »

Read it the first time. Also read you said "end of conversation" as well but carried on responding.

Their will be a few people on here now assume you have been driving in the middle lane and slow down if your challenged about it.

Forums are full of people jumping to conclusions unless you write down more information which you are failing to do. Thus we have to assume until we get corrected with the full story.

End of conversation about that particular topic. Which I have stuck to despite your best efforts.

Some people on forums deliberately misunderstand others for entertainment value. I occasionally do it myself. But not on this thread.

Who are these mythical 'other people' who share your opinion of me? Tell me why I should care.

stephen77

img wrote: »

I've read some crap in my time, but i've never seen anyone write it on such a consistent basis as you.There can be little doubt about who is the biggest menace on the roads.You freely admit to deliberately slowing down to inconvenience other drivers whose only alleged crime is that they want to use the road in accordance with the Highway Code and go faster than you.I would suggest you stick to taxis, but they never leave the middle lane.
And as far as bullies go, I don't think you'd know one if he hit you in the face.

Honey dog. - i think the person probably agrees with me with out jumping to a conclusion.

Honeydog

stephen77 wrote: »

Honey dog. - i think the person probably agrees with me with out jumping to a conclusion.

So that's one other bully.

Are there any more?

Plus a username with very few posts.Hmmm. Could be an alias. Claims to have read a lot of my posts..... . Fishy. Very fishy.

img

Honeydog wrote: »

So that's one other bully.

Are there any more?

Plus new username with very few posts.Hmmm. Could be an alias. Claims to have read a lot of my posts..... during the 5 days he's been on here. Fishy. Very fishy.

Nothing mythical about me.Very few posts because I use this forum for information and comment about subjects of interest to me.
Unlike some people I don't subject others to the first, or should that be only, thing to enter my head in order to wind other people up.I see you have been accused of trolling on another subject today.
Oh, and please don't call me names.That is bullying.

stephen77

Honeydog wrote: »

So that's one other bully.

Are there any more?

Plus new username with very few posts.Hmmm. Could be an alias. Claims to have read a lot of my posts..... during the 5 days he's been on here. Fishy. Very fishy.

You asked for people. I gave you one.

Your the person who asked for some one else, why would I make up a new alias to post in a thread a few days ago just incase you ask me to show "mythical people"

I have no idea how to find out who clicked the thank button to some of my comments back to yourself. So I guess they would like to know the answer, but at the moment remain nameless.

For the record I have not to my knowledge read any of your other posts.

Still going to duck and weave out of why you got flashed?

Honeydog

People = plural. However even if you find 100 people who agree with you I still won't discuss it with you. You already know why not. I'm surprised you keep asking. You obviously don't know how stubborn I am. You won't goad me into it however much you try.

Ah I didn't accuse YOU of having an alias but yet you deny it. Fishy. Very fishy.

If in the unlikely event, you actually post something new and interesting tonight I might deign to reply. Until then goodnight.