We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tube Drivers are at it again.

123468

Comments

  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    64,000,000 per year - over 20 years is1.2bn in overpayments. never mind pensions on top.

    it does make a vast difference. this is typical lefty nonsense to suggest it doesn't. this is not free money. where is that 1.22bn coming from???

    Why are we multiplying it by twenty? It's easier just to compare all things per year, because most things have a yearly budget. But I presume the 1.22bn over twenty years would come out of the billions and billions that TFL gets in income over the same twenty years.

    Look, tube trivers wages is less that 1% of the income of TFL. They get paid to much, but even if you managed to cut it by 50% it'd make no difference to much whatsoever. I'm simply saying that if you're really bothered about high public spending then tube driver salaries isn't really the area to focus on, as it's 0.0000001% of anything meaningful.
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    SACK THEM ALL AND CLOSE THE TUBE DOWN.

    It's these types of lines that means Ijust keep coming back to this forum. :)
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Give LU to Murdoch to run. He was pretty good a sorting these things, maybe a bit old now though.
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    Give LU to Murdoch to run. He was pretty good a sorting these things, maybe a bit old now though.

    Any decent CEO would do the same as the current one. Tube drivers take up so little of the overall budget that you wouldn't really worry how much they were paid.
  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Cleaver wrote: »
    Why are we multiplying it by twenty? It's easier just to compare all things per year, because most things have a yearly budget. But I presume the 1.22bn over twenty years would come out of the billions and billions that TFL gets in income over the same twenty years.

    Look, tube trivers wages is less that 1% of the income of TFL. They get paid to much, but even if you managed to cut it by 50% it'd make no difference to much whatsoever. I'm simply saying that if you're really bothered about high public spending then tube driver salaries isn't really the area to focus on, as it's 0.0000001% of anything meaningful.


    Tube drivers wages are not less than 1% of tfls budget- they are about 160 million a year. You're right in that it still doesn't amount to much - probably around 2%, although total employment costs are going to be well over double that.

    If tube drivers didn't strike all the time I doubt anyone would care what they were paid.

    Plus it's just the London equivalent of someone with a car moaning that petrol keeps getting more expensive, really. It's not as if this is the only repeat thread topic on here.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Cleaver wrote: »
    Any decent CEO would do the same as the current one. Tube drivers take up so little of the overall budget that you wouldn't really worry how much they were paid.

    Cleaver doth protest too much, methinks.
    To paraphrase the Bard

    No tube driver family have you :)

    I take you point though and shows that normally it would be sensible to look for a job with a capital intensive employer where wages are a small proportion of the cost structure.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Wages should be set by the ease in which the employee can be replaced. I would have thought that most people could drive a tube with a few months training and many would jump at the chance.
  • Dan:_4
    Dan:_4 Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    I would have thought that most people could drive a tube with a few months training and many would jump at the chance.

    You thought wrong. The training course is very techincal and demanding. If you pass the course you will then need to spend 6 weeks on further theroy, followed by 6 months stock training - learning about each type of train, every switch, every mechanism, so you can fix a train when it breaks down in a tunnel. Next you have to learn the signals and all the possable shunting positions. Finally you get to learn to drive the trains in a simulator. The whole thing takes about a year.

    Sure, the physical moving the trains through the tunnels is probarly the easy part, but there is a lot more knowledge required for when things go wrong.
  • wake up and smell the roses, these drivers are hated, despised filth and, like the miners, have priced themselves out of a job..


    What a despicable excuse for a human being you are. Crawl back under you right wing rock.
  • Ionkontrol wrote: »
    What a despicable excuse for a human being you are. Crawl back under you right wing rock.


    typical lefty. it's ok for you to have a go at me because i don't have your views but not ok for me to have a go at the overpaid tube drivers.

    the irony.

    idiot lefties, idiot public sector, idiot unions. it's enough to drive you mad.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.