e petition asking for internet constrols on !!!!!! etc

claire16c

bobajob_1966 wrote: »

I guess they would apply the block/ filter to the IP address, however anyone that is accessing the internet for illegal purposes is likely to use an IP proxy (so not using their own address), and I would guess that most teenagers would know how to do this also.

I also wonder who those that want the ban expect the scheme to administered, and who is to pay for the work involved?

I have no idea how to do that but Im guessing a google search would allow me to find out

How would the filter work though? I mean what would it literally block out? I dont see how it can block things effectively without blocking out stuff that isnt actually !!!!!!.

GobbledyGook

Children wouldn't have access to internet !!!!!! and the likes if they were supervised. Or if parents who don't know one end of a computer from the other took themselves on a course or read a book before allowing their child free access.

I won't be signing any petition. The responsibility for my child to have appropriate access to the internet falls to one person - me.

jamespir

Emmzi wrote: »

jamespir wrote:

yes i dont see how theres a problem if its ok for women to have semi naked hollyoaks stars or firemen or whatever [/QUOTE]


It depends where. Kylie/ fireman calenders at home, ok. Page 3 while I am eating my lunch, not ok. Seeing men looking at page 3 or commenting to each other on model's breast size at coffee break, not ok.

Sexy calenders anywhere in the workplace, not ok. Doesn't matter if I personally object or not, what about people with different morals, ethics, religions? Why should anyone be made to feel uncomfortable at work?

why would you feel uncomfortable ? its not like they want you to pose

it would not bother me if they had a calender of semi naked fireman at the work place wouldnt bother me if it were semi naked females


and were not all pervs who coment on there sizes etc

jamespir

surfsister wrote: »

at least this is generating discussion even if it seems to be impossible to stop hardcore !!!!!! or bomb making or whatever.

interesting stats here from http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html

Children Internet Pornography Statistics
Access to pornography is available from early on. The average age of a child’s first exposure to pornography is 11. A total of 90 percent of children ages 8-16 have viewed pornography online. Pornographers use many character names that appeal to children such as “Pokemon.”
Children Internet Pornography Statistics
Average age of first Internet exposure to pornography11 years oldLargest consumer of Internet pornography35 - 49 age group15-17 year olds having multiple hard-core exposures80%8-16 year olds having viewed !!!!!! online90% (most while doing homework)7-17 year olds who would freely give out home address29%7-17 year olds who would freely give out email address14%Children's character names linked to thousands of !!!!!! links26 (Including Pokemon and Action Man)

ive never ever seen any !!!!!! named after pokemon or action man
care to post us some links

jamespir

surfsister wrote: »

exactly, women are objectified everywhere - but it's harcore !!!!!! we're talking about which should be banned if at all possible or should we just give up and not even try to ban it?

sorry what do you define as hardcore !!!!!! ?


you should give up too

Torry_Quine

jamespir wrote: »

do you know the first thing a child sees when its born ?
its mothers breasts

That's very different and you know it. That is about providing nourishment and not some unnatural posed woman for men to ogle over.

jamespir

Torry_Quine wrote: »

That's very different and you know it. That is about providing nourishment and not some unnatural posed woman for men to ogle over.

not all men ogle over page 3


its clear the only ones who are upset are bigoted women and it has nothing to do with them feeling anything towards other women its cause there religion tells them its wrong

Torry_Quine

jamespir wrote: »

not all men ogle over page 3


its clear the only ones who are upset are bigoted women and it has nothing to do with them feeling anything towards other women its cause there religion tells them its wrong

I can't think of any other reason for a man to look at a half-naked woman.

Actually men as well as women are opposed to this kind of unwarranted nudity, it's actually about respecting other people.

jamespir

Torry_Quine wrote: »

I can't think of any other reason for a man to look at a half-naked woman.

Actually men as well as women are opposed to this kind of unwarranted nudity, it's actually about respecting other people.

why do women go gaga over naked men then millions watched the Chippendales
you see them on that loose women salivating when they have pics of men semi naked

its not just men who ogle
but i suppose that acceptable isnt it

Torry_Quine

jamespir wrote: »

why do women go gaga over naked men then millions watched the Chippendales
you see them on that loose women salivating when they have pics of men semi naked

its not just men who ogle
but i suppose that acceptable isnt it

I think that's equally unacceptable actually.