We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Added buy it now but never appeared
Comments
-
You can't revise listings like that once there has been a bid - it's not fair to the other bidders.
I would just tell the person to bid and hope they get the item for less than they intended to offer. There's no law saying they have to accept an offer like this and if there are bids there will probably be more. The person offering might actually kick-start a bidding war.
yes, it could be unfair to other bidders, thanks for that Crowqueen, although we all have to decide for ourselves what we consider fair.
(I meant the OP is able to revise the listing if it was still at the start price if she chooses.)
I love bidding wars! Best Wishes0 -
(I meant the OP is able to revise the listing if it was still at the start price if she chooses.)
Yes, but probably not if there is a bidder.
I would normally accept a BIN offer and put a BIN on, but if the BIN has gone and there is a bid, it makes no sense to disrupt the other person.
Whether or not we have different ideas of fair, eBay ban sellers from dramatically altering the listing if there are any bids, even if the price is still nominally at the opening price, and the other person is still free to bid if they want the item."Well, it's election year, Bill, we'd rather people didn't exercise common sense..." - Jed Bartlet, The West Wing, season 4
Am now Crowqueen, MRes (Law) - on to the PhD!0 -
You can't revise listings like that once there has been a bid - it's not fair to the other bidders.
I would just tell the person to bid and hope they get the item for less than they intended to offer. There's no law saying they have to accept an offer like this and if there are bids there will probably be more. The person offering might actually kick-start a bidding war.
re 'fairness', look at #25 from soolin,
'You have to cancel all bids and then end item.'
You seem to be suggesting cancelling is fair and revising is unfair to bidders.
Sellers do cancel bids you know for all sorts of reasons.
No-one has suggested revising an auction that has bids on, as it cannot be revised, only 'add to description'
Best wishes0 -
Well...it's up to the seller then.MissGivings wrote: »re 'fairness', look at #25 from soolin,
'You have to cancel all bids and then end item.'
You seem to be suggesting cancelling is fair and revising is unfair to bidders.
Sellers do cancel bids you know for all sorts of reasons.
No-one has suggested revising an auction that has bids on, as it cannot be revised, only 'add to description'
Best wishes
Personally I'd let it run.
But whatever."Well, it's election year, Bill, we'd rather people didn't exercise common sense..." - Jed Bartlet, The West Wing, season 4
Am now Crowqueen, MRes (Law) - on to the PhD!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards