Tesco misprice discussion area part 17

Constantine

leadhead wrote:

they must be Sainsbury employees............

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2887575.stm

4 years ago...you have gotta love the Internet!

I wonder whatever happened to her? Perhaps she now runs a caravan park somewhere :rotfl:

FloFlo

I do not and never have run a caravan park!!

rombomb

MyUserNamesTaken wrote:

It has become blatantly obvious that certain people (we all know who they are), regardless of being told to refrain from discussing ethics on this thread, seem determined to keep the discussion going by any means necessary (including confrontational and downright insulting comments). I can only assume that they do so in order to try to get the thread permanently closed. In light of this, please could everyone refrain from replying to said people.

We aren't talking about bluey, cheapy, chicky or TE here are we?

I can hardly recall any talk about misprices on this thread over the last few days, all just about R&R ending and DTD starting.

If the change of policy is being printed on top of receipts from today then we must R&R to death in the next week, as we can use the "Change Of Policy" as extra proof that we are due R&R and not just "the difference".

merlin48

Leadhead, I have been silent since being told that this is not a board on which to discuss ethical issues, other than to repost the moderators assertion of that fact earlier today.

However, it is very difficult not to respond to personal attacks.

I am certain that the term "troll" is not meant as a compliment and would ask you to state exactly what you mean by it and what actions of mine put me within your definition?

ginjim

constantine has the perfect link to explain what a troll is

Constantine

ginjim wrote:

constantine has the perfect link to explain what a troll is

I do, but mine and Leadheads definition differs I'm afraid.

Google is your friend.

FloFlo

rombomb wrote:

We aren't talking about bluey, cheapy, chicky or TE here are we?

I can hardly recall any talk about misprices on this thread over the last few days, all just about R&R ending and DTD starting.

If the change of policy is being printed on top of receipts from today then we must R&R to death in the next week, as we can use the "Change Of Policy" as extra proof that we are due R&R and not just "the difference".

It's a shame they didn't have the r&r policy printed on the receipts so that all customers were aware of the refund policy. I hope that they keep the receipts with details of the DTD on them so that customers are aware that they shouldn't get fobbed off with just the difference. I am sure the new policy will bring plenty of benefits with it, as a few of us who have had r&r this week have noticed that we would have been better off with double the difference.

merlin48

Constantine wrote:

I do, but mine and Leadheads definition differs I'm afraid.

Google is your friend.

Would it give me a result for a search on "leadhead's definition of a troll" ?

leadhead

Constantine wrote:

I do, but mine and Leadheads definition differs I'm afraid.

Google is your friend.

merlin48 wrote:

Would it give me a result for a search on "leadhead's definition of a troll" ?

From Techweb.........Troll

Posting derogatory messages about sensitive subjects on newsgroups and chat rooms to bait users into responding.

Which is what i believe the said users are doing, especially as they have been told(including by the mods) that this thread isnt for the "ethics of RandRing"

The same word IMO applies to those who constantly go on about it being, fraud, theft, stealing.......If it is...where are the prosecutions.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but if that opinion is proved to be incorrect(eg theft, fraud etc),,,,,,,then their constant baiting and goading by using these terms IMO is trolling.

webuserisme

It's not as if at least one of these, shall we say, 'detractors' hasn't got 'previous' with regard to deliberately seeking to provoke a response. Aaahh, the joys of being able to check out a person's posting history on here. Like I have intimated before, responding to them only seeks to increase their already over-estimated self-importance. Let 'em talk to themselves, you know it makes sense, people.