The CSA keeps badgering me to go back to work, but work doesnt pay, suggestions pleas

Marisco

JamesP1976 wrote: »

I didnt. I just chose the wrong woman, a money obsessed cheat.

The sad thing is, other people spotted this long before I did, and I ignored their warnings.

This sounds just like my oh's ex (apart from the cheating bit) The difference is, he always paid, and moved heaven and earth to see the kids, despite her being a piece of work, the heartache, and her putting every obstacle and pouring poison in their ears!! The kids are now adults, and have turned out well, despite their mother. I put this down to my oh's input. Before I came across this "person" (and that is being generous!!!) I didn't realise people could actually behave like that!!!

Transformer

I also believe this op makes it up as he goes along. I could type I am related to the queen, who would know if true of not but I and her!!!!!!!!!

No one reading here would know for sure just from what I type, I have made my posts and on the information op volunteerd, he helped me make opinion that he is not a 'nice little boy'

I remember what a relative once told me, to be a good liar you have to have a good memory. If you have a poor memory you will get caught out. Hence he never lied as well would trip himself up and was better than that anyhow.

you see you post away, have given various information in posts and when replies came, you dont like them and wonder how we form that opinion.

You did it yourself.

I could have gone after this and that from my ex as in his pension that was amassed when we were together, I didnt, because thie rule and that proviso will only hold you back and cause stress on your life when it is better to face up to things and move on.

you may have new partner, but you have not moved on

Wasteland_Drifter

Meanwhile, back on planet Earth.

James, when you send your letter, ask the post office counter for a certificate of posting, this is not the same a proof of posting. This is certificated posting.

If you really want to catch out the CSA then do this, it worked a treat for me in writing off lots of arrears, but is not guaranteed.

Send the letter in duplicate, one certificated, and the other by recorded delivery. The CSA sometimes refuse to sign for a letter and it bounces back. This proves the letter did reach its destination. You now have corroborated proof of delivery.

The duplicate was received by the CSA because it was refused, and the certificated didn’t not need a signature so the PO box address they were sent is a working address.

It also proves the CSA is deliberately trying to avoid receiving written communications. It doesn’t matter if the CSA says it was a mistake, its irrefutable at a tribunal.

Remember, send it twice, certificate and the other, recorded.

Ive sent you a PM with a nice little CSA gem.

skibadee

I really think this thread has ran its course, there just seems to be unneccessary comments being put on here now.
I think the OP knows what he should be doing.
Maybe its time to close this thread.

Transformer

'writing it off' csa wise is all very well as long as the pwc still gets the money from the csa. If writing it off means the children will not get the arrears then you morally STINK!!!!!!!!!!

I am not saying some people really struggle with the csa, but you have to consider I bet they have a battle dealing with some deliberate pains in the bott squirming every angle to avoid and hide even behind making thier new partner work so they can show zero income!!!!!!!!!!!!

Man or mouse, nope man or RAT!!!!!!!!!!!!

You know I have pet rats who smell better and have more morals than you. Perhaps my remi could teach you that rats get a bad name from bums.

Transformer

skibadee wrote: »

I really think this thread has ran its course, there just seems to be unneccessary comments being put on here now.
I think the OP knows what he should be doing.
Maybe its time to close this thread.

I agree:j

Close it op, you will get no more info that you do not have.

You just want to ridicule those who reply and call us hens:rotfl:

Orson_Cart_2

JamesP1976 wrote: »

And is there a way to get the CSA to quit with the pesky telephone calls?

If the civil remedy in the PFA does not work or the CSA ignores your letter(s), then make a note of the callers name and contact police reporting a criminal offence under under section 43(1)(b) of the Telecommunications Act 1984.

If the police palm you off with saying its a civil matter then print the following legislation and make a complaint to the IPCC of a further offence of Perverting the Course of Justice.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/12/section/43

Transformer

JamesP1976 wrote: »

The CSA keeps ringing me up and telling me to go back to work. Im not signing on so I dont think I have to. I paid off the mortgage from an inheritance several years ago.

The problem is, simply, too expensive.

My gf works 2 days a week and earns £10640 a year, she gets W&CTC's £5243.71 and pays £1299.20 in tac and NI giving a total net income of 14584.51.

I paid off the mortgage several years ago so I dont have much outgoings and dont need to work, so I look after our 2 year old while my gf is at work.

The CSA want me to go out to work, but I cant because they cheated last time on a previous assessment on CS1 by banning travel to work costs when I was actually allowed it *(150miles/week rule) on CS1 which confirmed it did not pay me to work.

I would earn (£7.05per/h) £14665 before tax as a multi-drop delivery driver taxed/NI of £2426.30 leaving a nett of £12238.70. The CSA would charge me £3761.61 a year for two other children (not absent through my own choice) leaving a residual income of £8477.09.

My g/f would also lose her tax credits because my income is taken into account and HMRC disregards child mainetnance liabilities, a loss of £5243.71 a year which leaves a net gain of £3305.09 a year if I went back to work.

Its not worth me working for £63.55 a week. Have I missed anything?

The CSA will not give any consessions, nor agree any settlements until after I have gone back to work. I offered to return to work on condition they correct the previous assessment for travel to work, but they hide behind rules and regulations. Given this attitude, I dont trust the CSA to commit to work.

And is there a way to get the CSA to quit with the pesky telephone calls?

Regards, James

'the csa hide behind their rules and regulations'

You dont trust the csa to commit to work, there is more to this story than we see and ops following posts how the true nature is one of avoidance because if worked and had improvement of any kind would need to pay csa like any good dad would. Ops partner would lose tax credits, a benefit, what about respect of not having to rely on top ups.

You see op might not himself see much of an improvment according to him money wise, BUT HEY THE KIDS HE DOES NOT SEE WOULD GET SOME MONEY FOR THEIR CARE, he also says he cannot afford a solicitor and therefore is refused to see his kids, so you are saying you choose not to work to even get the chance of seeing them.

Hence wants to moan and do nowt so this thread has not gone exactly how he planned!!!!!!!!!

Such is life :rotfl:

Orville

Jesus you lot have been going some since i last posted ...lol

Orson_Cart_2

Havnt you anything better to do Transformer?