We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Average Speed Tax

1356

Comments

  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    jase1 wrote: »
    The only time I've come across average speed cameras has been on motorways during road-works. Perhaps I'm lucky coming from the North East, I'm not sure...

    These cameras I am in total favour of; it can't be easy for those who have to work on a fast road like that, and I have nothing but disgust for those who exceed the limits in those areas anyway.


    No problem with that when they are working;)
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • jaydeeuk1
    jaydeeuk1 Posts: 7,714 Forumite
    Debt-free and Proud!
    real1314 wrote: »
    The Snake Pass is the A57 from Glossop to Sheffield, I'm not sure you'd combine that with the Cat and Fiddle?

    As for cameras, remember that when your speedo says 55mph, it can be anything down to 50mph. Use a Satnav for a more accurate speed reading. :cool:

    My bad. Thought snake pass was the name of the road between macclesfield and buxton!
  • Harry_Flashman
    Harry_Flashman Posts: 1,922 Forumite
    Outpost wrote: »
    It's not a tax. ;)

    Yes it is, it's what revenue collection cameras are all about.
  • cajef
    cajef Posts: 6,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Yes it is, it's what revenue collection cameras are all about.
    Nothing to do with saving lives or helping to prevent people from being maimed and disabled for life then?
  • Harry_Flashman
    Harry_Flashman Posts: 1,922 Forumite
    cajef wrote: »
    Nothing to do with saving lives or helping to prevent people from being maimed and disabled for life then?

    Very little if any.
  • cajef
    cajef Posts: 6,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Very little if any.

    Try going to a few RTA's and picking up the pieces and I do not just mean vehicle pieces and you may change your mind.
  • Harry_Flashman
    Harry_Flashman Posts: 1,922 Forumite
    I know that RTAs are terrible things (I've only ever attended one serious RTA), I know the presence of speed cameras had no effect on that one.

    Cameras are there to make money, end of story.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    alexlyne wrote: »
    I always went down the M4 around Newport at 55mph, and never got fined for it. As post8 said, the threshold is always set quite high.
    If there's the 10%+2mph rule for fixed cameras to compensate for dodgy speedos (or whatever), then the same must have to hold for average speed cameras too.

    Of course, if you're gonna brick it for half the journey then ease off for the rest, you've gotta be confident in yourself or your trip computer ;)

    This is an old cliche, especially on here. There is no "rule," if your speedometer is underreading, it is an offence and your own fault, it is not a defence and manufacturers do not set the speedometer to overread by ten per cent.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Harry_Flashman
    Harry_Flashman Posts: 1,922 Forumite
    But, as I understand it, 10% is the allowable margin of error on a speedo. It's certainly about that for mine.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    boyse7en wrote: »
    The ones I believe the OP is referring to are at the Cat and Fiddle, which were put there almost specifically for motorcycles. They are, I think, the only average speed cameras in the UK that read rear numberplates.

    There are a couple of issues with them though. Which have been detailed in MCN - mainly the fact that there are alternative routes between some of the cameras.

    Don't bike riders just cover their woefully inadequately sized number plates, when riding along that road anyway?
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.