We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IN10 Conviction
Comments
-
andy_foster wrote: »If you weren't insured, why are your insurers paying?
You may find the insurance company will come after the OP to re-coup their costs.0 -
-
kingbuxton wrote: »Would this work do you think?
if there is questionable doudt as to whether or not your were insured or not and the FSA has started an investigation into the insurers, then the offence is not clear cut, the court should be understanding and offer a period of extension, call the courts clerk and give him your ombudsman case ref number, the clerk will call the ombudsman and find out what progress has been made and confirm that you have a case, the rest is upto the judge to decide how much extension to give.0 -
Surely it states on the certificate whether you have the DOC extension, regardless of what the ins policy says. In my experience, if it ain't on the cert, it ain't on the policy, and I have seen thousands of Certs.0
-
Turns out, Aviva paid the claim, thus I was Insured, Thus I got off.
Ha ha fcking ha.0 -
kingbuxton wrote: »Thus I got off.
You can't "get off" with something you weren't guilty of;)We need the earth for food, water, and shelter.
The earth needs us for nothing.
The earth does not belong to us.
We belong to the Earth0 -
Indeed, if you were genuinely insured then you didn't "get off", you got justice.
How did the Careless Driving go? Perhaps you did "get off" that if they took no further action?0 -
Thanks for the update and congratulations. Nice for once to see a victory for those who are trying to abide by the law.0
-
Thanks to all.
The smug remark was only aimed at those previously sniping0 -
Good result.
Far too many people are too keen to spout "it was in the t&c's, you must have mis read it".
Makes you think there must be a lot of soft touches out there.
Glad you're not one of them. At least others gave you suport and good advice.
The insurers need to be challenged when they're wrong.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards